Sim
25-04-2004, 01:35 AM
Some of you might remember a while back (nearly 18 months now !) I published an update to my analysis of the Adelaide real estate market based on the count of pages in the real estate liftout of the Advertiser newspaper every Saturday.
Well, I decided to tidy up the study this weekend, and thought it might be time to get rid of the pile of newspapers sitting in the corner (several feet high - and that's just the real estate liftouts !).
I've updated my charts with the latest figures and I've even been able to start mapping out some basic trends, which show, unfortunately, nothing terribly surprising.
You can blame Michele_B for the idea - it was her who put me on to the observation that the number of pages in the real estate liftout changed quite significantly over the course of a year and suggested that it might be an indication of the state of the local market.
The theory is that the more pages there are in the liftout, the more houses there are on the market. This could mean that houses are not selling (dead market), but it could also just mean that they are selling, and more people are continuing to sell (boom market). This naturally shows the danger in making naieve analysis of the raw statistics in that you could have the same figure mean two totally different things.
The question is - do people tend not to sell if the market is considered dead ? Obviously there are people who will sell because they have to or decide it is time to trade up or move areas, but in a boom period I assume you would get a lot more people putting their house on the market because "the Smiths down the road got a great price for their house and ours is much nicer than theirs !!". So perhaps in a dead market you would not see anywhere near as many houses in the real estate section, and so the page count would be a lot less than in a boom time when everyone wants to sell.
I guess the only real measure of the state of the market is how long properties take to sell. In a really hot market, they would be selling within days of listing, and so may only ever be in the paper for one weekend advert. In a dead market, they would potentially take weeks or even months to sell, and so might continue to be listed in the paper week after week, which of course starts to mess with any analysis we might choose to make about what the number of pages means.
So what does it really mean ? Not a lot I don't think. It's just some more interesting statistics that you shouldn't really try and read too much in to I suggest.
Anyway, attached are two charts - the first shows the raw count of pages in the real estate sales lift out, plus the count of the number of columns of unit rentals and house rentals as well.
The second graphic shows the same view, but normalised back to a maximum of 1 (being the highest value for the observed period and 0 being the lowest value), and has the three different graphs superimposed on each other so we can attempt to see if there are correlations between the number
Well, I decided to tidy up the study this weekend, and thought it might be time to get rid of the pile of newspapers sitting in the corner (several feet high - and that's just the real estate liftouts !).
I've updated my charts with the latest figures and I've even been able to start mapping out some basic trends, which show, unfortunately, nothing terribly surprising.
You can blame Michele_B for the idea - it was her who put me on to the observation that the number of pages in the real estate liftout changed quite significantly over the course of a year and suggested that it might be an indication of the state of the local market.
The theory is that the more pages there are in the liftout, the more houses there are on the market. This could mean that houses are not selling (dead market), but it could also just mean that they are selling, and more people are continuing to sell (boom market). This naturally shows the danger in making naieve analysis of the raw statistics in that you could have the same figure mean two totally different things.
The question is - do people tend not to sell if the market is considered dead ? Obviously there are people who will sell because they have to or decide it is time to trade up or move areas, but in a boom period I assume you would get a lot more people putting their house on the market because "the Smiths down the road got a great price for their house and ours is much nicer than theirs !!". So perhaps in a dead market you would not see anywhere near as many houses in the real estate section, and so the page count would be a lot less than in a boom time when everyone wants to sell.
I guess the only real measure of the state of the market is how long properties take to sell. In a really hot market, they would be selling within days of listing, and so may only ever be in the paper for one weekend advert. In a dead market, they would potentially take weeks or even months to sell, and so might continue to be listed in the paper week after week, which of course starts to mess with any analysis we might choose to make about what the number of pages means.
So what does it really mean ? Not a lot I don't think. It's just some more interesting statistics that you shouldn't really try and read too much in to I suggest.
Anyway, attached are two charts - the first shows the raw count of pages in the real estate sales lift out, plus the count of the number of columns of unit rentals and house rentals as well.
The second graphic shows the same view, but normalised back to a maximum of 1 (being the highest value for the observed period and 0 being the lowest value), and has the three different graphs superimposed on each other so we can attempt to see if there are correlations between the number