NigelW
10-03-2005, 10:16 AM
Hi All
a new draft tax ruling has been released by the ATO for comment.
You can look at it here:
http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/results.htm?basic=%22TR%202005%2Fd4%22&rank=on&dbdomain=?&prevDomainTitle=All%20of%20the%20Legal%20Database
(Not sure if I got that right - if not search ATO Legal database for "TR 2005/D4").
The gist of it is arguing that what's called the refinancing principle, from a case called Roberts and Smith, doesn't always apply to make interest paid by Trustees on borrowings to pay distributions deductible to the trustee.
Although it's a long read there's a whole range of examples in the document which might be useful info for people interested in this area.
I'd be interested to hear what Nick, Dale and Julia's thoughts are on the ATO's rejection of what they describe as the "alternative view"...bearing in mind the ATO's not always right - they're just the biggest bully in the playground :D
Cheers
N.
a new draft tax ruling has been released by the ATO for comment.
You can look at it here:
http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/results.htm?basic=%22TR%202005%2Fd4%22&rank=on&dbdomain=?&prevDomainTitle=All%20of%20the%20Legal%20Database
(Not sure if I got that right - if not search ATO Legal database for "TR 2005/D4").
The gist of it is arguing that what's called the refinancing principle, from a case called Roberts and Smith, doesn't always apply to make interest paid by Trustees on borrowings to pay distributions deductible to the trustee.
Although it's a long read there's a whole range of examples in the document which might be useful info for people interested in this area.
I'd be interested to hear what Nick, Dale and Julia's thoughts are on the ATO's rejection of what they describe as the "alternative view"...bearing in mind the ATO's not always right - they're just the biggest bully in the playground :D
Cheers
N.