Ebbie
30-11-2005, 09:35 PM
On page 74 of the Dec 2005 edition of API magazine Rob Balanda talks about protecting property already held in your own name.
He suggests you could grant an option allowing your trust to buy your property for a price equal to the amount of the loan over the property. Basically if you get sued the litigant can't sell the property and access the increased equity because the trust will exercise the option and benefit from any increase in value, rather than the creditor.
This sounds fairly simple when compared with the other methods like second mortgages and cross securitisation (overstamping) etc.
Would anyone like to have a go at pointing out the advantages/disadvantages of doing it this way?
He suggests you could grant an option allowing your trust to buy your property for a price equal to the amount of the loan over the property. Basically if you get sued the litigant can't sell the property and access the increased equity because the trust will exercise the option and benefit from any increase in value, rather than the creditor.
This sounds fairly simple when compared with the other methods like second mortgages and cross securitisation (overstamping) etc.
Would anyone like to have a go at pointing out the advantages/disadvantages of doing it this way?