PDA

View Full Version : Waterfront Investment For Sale


Kevin Hockey
01-03-2003, 07:59 AM
Hi everyone,

I am expecting to list an absolute waterfront property today in Sandgate. If, as I expect, I do, I wanted to offer any investors in the forum an opportunity because the chance at this is very rare. I expect the property will sell very quickly.

It has clear, unobstructed views of Moreton Bay and Redcliffe, truly sensational. The house is a 3 bedroom colonial cottage Queenslander and new kitchen. The dining is off the kitchen and you can eat and cook and watch the boats sail past. Land size is 511m2.

This opportunity was too good not to let you know about. As I have said it hasn't been listed yet but I wanted to try and provide you with a little extra time to consider it. Once the property is on the market I will have my Property Manager try to asses its rental value. I am expecting it to be 300-350 pw

If anyone is interested please email me your details at kevinhockey@nundahfirstnational.com.au

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sim
01-03-2003, 09:36 AM
Kevin, to fit in with the forum guidelines, I have moved this to Caveat Emptor - and we're going to need a bit more information if we're going to allow it to stay.

Please read the guidelines here to familiarise yourself with what is acceptable: http://www.somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=399#post399

In particular we are going to need more specifics about things like price. The idea is that we can analyse the deal and see whether we think it is good or not.

We do not accept advertisements - which this post is at the moment.

Kevin Hockey
01-03-2003, 01:01 PM
Thanks Sim, I wasn't sure what protocol was with regard to this and I have never meant to use the forum for advertising, however I thought many people may be interested. If I step outside guidelines anytime please let me know.

Ta

Kev

Kevin Hockey
01-03-2003, 01:25 PM
Ok I've read the rules and I'll try and elaborate.

The property has now been listed, although no price has been set on it. The sale of a property further down the street recently for $550,000 suggests this should sell above $600,000 and probably below $650,000. As I mentioned earlier I expect it would rent for around 300-350pw. I will confirm that further for you. There is a property close by currently listed for offers over 1.2mill. Capital growth is definately the key here.

Sandgate is an old suburb about 15km north of CBD. It looks straight out over Moreton Bay. Sandgate has undergone major changes in recent years with bikeways, gardens, cafes etc. Every weekend it is packed with people walking their dogs, having lunch etc and playing with the kids.

Exact statistics I am not sure of, but the area has seen enormous growth in recent years. Traditionally it has been an area dominated by elderly people however that trend has changed significantly and is now very popular with the "Dinks" and "Yuppies".

This site may provide some info on the area, www.sandgate.net

I hope this helps, I will provide more info as I can. I apologise for the "commercial" however this is an extremely rare opportunity and I wanted to provide you with the chance of at least being aware of it. If I have used the forum out of context please let me know, I won't be offended and I will know next time.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sunstone
01-03-2003, 02:20 PM
Dear guys,

A little bit more statistical info on Sandgate.

Capital Growth in:
March 2002 quarter: 10%
June 2002 quarter: -4%
Sept 2002 quarter: 6.77%

Median price Sept 2002 $244,505

Average rental for 4017 postcode (Includes Bracken Ridge/Brighton/Deagon/Sandgate)(December 2002 RTA figures)
: $200/week.


Gross yield for the suburb 4.25%

About 32 minutes on the train to central station.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

Sim
01-03-2003, 06:08 PM
Originally posted by Kevin Hockey
Ok I've read the rules and I'll try and elaborate.

Thanks for the extra info Kevin.

Are yields typically that low in the region ? I know you say it's a capital growth play - but those yields are almost Sydney levels !

I will confess to knowing very little about Brisbane real estate - particularly coastal properties. So I'm just curious to know whether it really is that bad for yields there when yields elsewhere in Brisbane are much higher than comparable properties in Sydney ?

Les
01-03-2003, 06:28 PM
Good point, Sim',


Let's take the BEST price $600k and the BEST rent $350k / week and we end up with 3% - which (imho) is NOT normal for Brisbane. Maybe it's normal for Brisbane with views of the harbour? Kev??

Regards,

geoffw
01-03-2003, 08:52 PM
Something like this must be more of a lifestyle decision than an investment decision.Capital growth is definately the key hereProbably. But Sunstone's figures suggest mixed growth figures.

Though I guess it doesn't take into account the water views and whatever.

Probably a bit too much into the gamble territory for many in here?

Kevin Hockey
01-03-2003, 11:48 PM
I do agree totally with you guys, there is definately some lifestyle about the decision also. I posted it for someone who's major consideration is capital growth. It is one of Brisbane's fastest growing regions at the moment.

Return will be low, although as I have said the rental is my prediction I still have to check that one out. I tried to play with the figures myself to make it work for me. I considered renting it out by the room, thought I could get around $420pw. There are a few big hospitals in the region and I thought I may be able to attract some nurses to it. However I have a large investment in my business and need a better return for me to make it work also.

I really tried to come up with an avenue because my prediction is it will be worth $1 mil within 5 years max. If you need return, like myself, you will have to go and kick the cat unfortunately. (figuritely speaking to all you cat lovers) :D

Bottom line is it's genuine waterfront property of Moreton Bay. That alone will see someone pay some extraordinary amount for it.

As much as I thank Sunstone's for the stats you can't in any way compare areas such as Bracken Ridge to Sandgate even though they have the same postcode. They are "worlds" apart.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sim
02-03-2003, 09:17 AM
Is it "absolute" water frontage ? ie - you walk out your front door down onto the sand or into the water ? Or is there a road to cross ? Not that it makes much differece - just curious.

Water view properties are difficult to come by - absolute water frontage is even more difficult. So if you are looking for scarcity factor, and it seems like it may have good facilities in the area (not too many nurses I know can afford water front properties - but their spouses may work in IT :D ) - and if you can afford the servicability then it may work well.

Sunstone
02-03-2003, 12:28 PM
Dear Kev,

Agree that postcode is not always accurate for suburb. That's why I feel much more comfortable with the REIQ/DNR/ABR figures based on actual suburb rather than the residex postcode with just example suburb in API. (Yes we all know Residex can produce figures by suburb as well as postcode but these are the figures that they are publically producing so do have an impact on public opinion.)

Median prices on other suburbs in postcode then for a further comparison:

Bracken Ridge
-Sept '02 Median Price: $179,000

Capital Growth in:
March 2002 quarter: -10%
June 2002 quarter: 10%
Sept 2002 quarter: 6.87%


Brighton
-Sept '02 Median Price: $194,000

Capital Growth in:
March 2002 quarter: 8%
June 2002 quarter: 11%
Sept 2002 quarter: 11.62%


Deagon
-Sept '02 Median Price: $165,000

Capital Growth in:
March 2002 quarter: 0%
June 2002 quarter: 3%
Sept 2002 quarter: 10%


What type of zoning for the property Kev?


Sim/guys,

Agree with Les' comment that 3% yield is VERY low for Brisbane. Based on the four from a purely statistical basis Brighton has had more reliable growth with maybe Deagon having a little bit more growth left in the tank.

A high capital growth place with very low yield does have a higher element of risk. If the location is great then it is going to appeal to A) A home owner purchasing on an emotional rather than rational figure basis or B) To a developer who is able to relocate this house and build a medium rise set of units to capitalise on the views. However it then comes down to zoning.

Maybe instead if the house was sound it could be converted. Hypothetically if you converted it into 3 or 4 two bedroom units (Is it a highset Kev?) then maybe a ballpark rent of $250/unit would make the yield more attractive. ?60K/unit conversion could get the total rental for the four up to $1,000 week ($250 x 4) for total outlay of $840,000. Would mean the gross yield would increase to 6.2%. Much better than the 3% but still on the low side considering the higher level of risk.

Sim I thought about asking whether we should get Kevin to post a link to the property so that we can have a more visual look to get some ideas. In thinking about this however I am in two minds. It would be useful to look at it (yes a picture is worth a thousand words) but at the same time this sets a precedent for future examples. Could this be a bad thing?

Look forward to further comments guys.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

XBenX
02-03-2003, 02:40 PM
I think posting a link w/ pics would be benefical when its listed....

i dont think spammers will get away w/ anything around here... everyone jumps on them pretty quick

plus our mighty mod can just delete it anyhow if its not appropriate.

just my thoughts...

Sim
02-03-2003, 02:58 PM
Personally, I feel that following the "more information is better" thought - posting pictures or links to information on the web is a good thing.

If they were posted on their own then not... but in addition to all the information posted in the thread, I think it's okay.

But I will have to defer to Les on this one... Les ! What do you think ?

PS. I think this is one of the better Caveat Emptor threads we've had in a while !

geoffw
02-03-2003, 04:11 PM
A link would be OK- however, Kev did say that it was not yet listed- so I guess he wouldn't have a link just yet.

Les
02-03-2003, 04:46 PM
G'day Sim',

You said "If they were posted on their own then not... but in addition to all the information posted in the thread, I think it's okay."

I agree that a link on its own is NOT acceptable. But if it supplements info that is provided, and that info fits the "rules", then I can't see why this can't be done.


Regards,

Sunstone
02-03-2003, 07:02 PM
Dear guys,

Sounds good then.

Well in that case I think we would welcome Kev to post a link with the property in question. In the case that it hadn't been listed then I think he's resourceful enough to take digital pictures to have a public link listed. (Worst case have a talk with Sim to ask for more help.)

Pictures. General pictures inside and outside but blocking letterbox number to protect yourself I think would be practical for further analysis.

You got us started on this one Kev. Looking forward to the next installment.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

suggo
02-03-2003, 07:45 PM
The waterfront at Sandgate doesn't have sand, and for years it was just a wall to hold back the tides. Yes you do have to cross the road to get to the waterfront. There has been a heap of improvments done over the last ten or so years and it is a very nice area now.
Up the Sandgate end there are parks and BBQ areas availiable and then a short walk further around there is the Shorncliffe pier which has became quite popular in recent times.
A bikeway runs along the full length of the front from the bridge to Redcliffe up and around to the pier. Very sort after now, Sandgate has also been going thru an upgrade(see BCC plans) so to speak and is becoming very nice little town. The hospital is really only for the elderly I believe, part of Eventide which is like an old peoples home but pretty big!
Originally most of the houses along the front were just your normal run of the mill colonials with a few exceptional old places there(some ex-flats that have been done up etc). But over the last ten years they have either been done up to the nines or knocked down to make way for some really quite exceptional houses. It is a very nice place to be now!

Kev, if I could afford to pay the difference between the rent and the interest and expences you would have already had a sold sign up, but alas (DAMN DAMN). Good luck with selling it I don't think you'll have to many difficulties disposing of it!

Kevin Hockey
02-03-2003, 10:29 PM
Hi Guys,

In post number 4 I did mention it had been listed. Photos have been taken but I doubt it is on the web yet...just a min, I'll go check....I'm back, sorry I took so long:D. No not up yet.

Thanks Suggo for the info. My phone hasn't stopped ringing and although I don't normally work on Sundays I have already had 2 inspections today and 1 offer so far. The offer is from an investor.
The property is semi-highset, around 1 metre (3 foot) off the ground. Yes you have to cross the road. While I was there today I watched container ships heading into port, people swimming, walking their dogs and a calvalcade of good looking ladies passing by (I wasn't looking darl I promise, trust me I'm a real estate agent:D)

As soon as I have a link I will post it.

Thanks for your support, I didn't mean to create any issues, just provide a possible opportunity. I have had some emails expressing interest.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Ruby
03-03-2003, 08:22 AM
Originally posted by Sim

PS. I think this is one of the better Caveat Emptor threads we've had in a while !

I agree with Sim here!......it's great to see all the due diligence going on, even though I have no idea of where you are talking about.

Can't wait to see the pictures Kev :D

Ruby

Kevin Hockey
03-03-2003, 06:12 PM
I have tried attaching some pics but the files are too big. I'll try and arrange for it to be on my web for tomorrow.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sunstone
03-03-2003, 07:05 PM
Dear Kev,

In cutting the picture size down have a look at www.acdsee.com and the shareware program you can use to cut down the size of the picture in the options or to reduce the picture quality. Also make sure it is a .jpg.

http://files.acdsystems.com/english/acdsee/acdsee.exe


Let us know if you need some more help.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

Kevin Hockey
03-03-2003, 09:17 PM
Many people over time have suggested I need help Sunstone. As far as computers go thats a definite. :D

I'll have a play with it and hopefully I can work it out (yeah right kev).

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sunstone
03-03-2003, 09:42 PM
Dear Kev,

You underestimate yourself mate.

Everything starts in the mind.

If you think you can you can. If you think you can't you can't.

The mind is powerful in what it can enable us to do........ or in creating artificial boundaries/limitations.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

P.S. I can remember in a previous life I have even done desktop publishing in Arabic even though I can't speak or read the language. Mindset..............

Kevin Hockey
03-03-2003, 10:12 PM
It's ok Sunstone, every now and then I like to make sure I'm in control of my ego. Gets away from me sometimes.

Nice to know you care though!!:)

I'm not winning so far however. I have an "attach file" at the bottom of this but to privately email Sim it doesn't show. :confused:

I'll get the pictures to you one way or another.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Kevin Hockey
04-03-2003, 08:38 AM
I have just emailed the photos to Sim however it is also now on my website.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Sim
04-03-2003, 08:44 AM
Photo 1

/forums/photopost/data/514/839278_flinders_001s.jpg

[ EDIT: moved image to photo gallery and replaced with image link - Sim' ]

Sim
04-03-2003, 08:45 AM
Photo 2

/forums/photopost/data/514/839278_flinders_002b.jpg

[ EDIT: moved image to photo gallery and replaced with image link - Sim' ]

Sim
04-03-2003, 08:45 AM
Photo 3

/forums/photopost/data/514/839278_flinders_003b.jpg

[ EDIT: moved image to photo gallery and replaced with image link - Sim' ]

Sim
04-03-2003, 08:46 AM
Photo 4

/forums/photopost/data/514/839misc_003b.jpg

[ EDIT: moved image to photo gallery and replaced with image link - Sim' ]

see_change
04-03-2003, 06:26 PM
Just to comment on something that Sim mentioned earlier re description of property as absolute waterfront.

I would consider an "absolute Waterfront" as a property that has Title up to the actual water.

A waterfront reserve will have title to a strip of crown land between it and the high water mark.

Opposite water usually implies there is a road or seperate park between the property and the water.

The differences can make a significant differance in price. At Pearl Beach ( several years ago , Absolute Beach fronts would sell for over 1 Mill, while Houses opposite water ( quiet road between house and water ) would sell for around 5-600.

More recently at Patonga waterfronts were selling for 1 Mill while Waterfront reserves were around 600.

I haven't looked at waterfronts in Brisbane so I don't know if the same general rules apply so I would be interested in finding out.

see change

Sunstone
04-03-2003, 08:12 PM
Dear Sim/Kev,

Thanks for putting up the pictures.

Easier to visualise now.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

Kevin Hockey
04-03-2003, 10:26 PM
Hi see change,

You may be right, I won't argue with you on that one. My reason for using the word absolute was it is unobstructed and can never be obstructed in any way. To me that's absolute. Neither here nor there in my opinion. You say tomato's .....

Picture 1 is obviously of the house
Picture 2 shows the view to Redcliffe
Picture 3 shows Moreton Island. In life you can actually see the sandhills on the island. It is a 2 hr barge trip from Redcliffe.
Picture 4 shows the Sandgate pier within walking distance.

All photos were taken from the front of the property.

I have just arrived home (past 10pm) from presenting 2 offers to the owner. Still in negotiations, I'll let you know the outcome.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au (http://nundahrealestate.com.au)

Mike
04-03-2003, 11:43 PM
Hi Kevin,

I notice in pic 1 that the other house on the left towers over your house. Are there any privacy or light issues? Incidentally, what size camera lens did you use on the water shots? Not a long lens, I hope? ;)

Regards, Mike

Kevin Hockey
05-03-2003, 09:07 PM
Originally posted by Mike
Hi Kevin,

I notice in pic 1 that the other house on the left towers over your house. Are there any privacy or light issues? Incidentally, what size camera lens did you use on the water shots? Not a long lens, I hope? ;)

Regards, Mike

No Mike, no issues with light. Privacy however is probably not going to be so important to the eventual purchaser of this property. Because it is waterfront there are always many people passing by with kids, dogs, eating fish and chips etc. As far as the neighbour is concerned though that side of the house is kitchen, dining etc, not too much of an issue there.

It's pretty close to sold I believe, we'll see what comes out of it all tomorrow.

Photo was taken by a Kodak digital DX4330. It has a zoom but hardly anything outstanding. The pictures are a reasonable portrayal of the property, but I could have taken photos of the Hornibrook Bridge, Fisherman's island, ships, boats, local swimming pool and lots more. All this is visible from the property.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Tony
20-03-2003, 07:37 AM
Hi Kevin,
Has the house been sold? If so was it purchased by someone on this forum or by a local? Can i be cheeky and ask what the sale price was?

Regards Tony.

Kevin Hockey
20-03-2003, 10:30 PM
Originally posted by Tony
Hi Kevin,
Has the house been sold? If so was it purchased by someone on this forum or by a local? Can i be cheeky and ask what the sale price was?

Regards Tony.

Hi Tony,

The interest from the forum has been terrific. As soon as I can post a sale price I shall do so.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

see_change
21-03-2003, 02:30 PM
Kevin

Does this mean it hasn't sold , or that you can't disclose the sale price as of yet ?

see change

Mr Ed
21-03-2003, 03:48 PM
KH

How good would this house be if you lifted it up, put a veranda around the front & side and build in under.

Would make a nice PPOR.

Mr Ed

Ps Do share with us the price even if you can't share the buyer.

BUNDY
21-03-2003, 06:23 PM
Kev,

Can you please advise how big the land is and what the zoning is. All very well to suggest building units, but will the council allow it. The frontage looks quite narrow.

BUNDY

Les
21-03-2003, 06:41 PM
G'day Bundy,

From post #1 "Land size is 511m2' - zoning doesn't appear to have been mentioned......

Regards,

Kevin Hockey
21-03-2003, 09:49 PM
Hi Guys, The zoning will be Res A. The site wouldn't be large unough for units anyway nor would the frontage.

Mr Ed - Most people I have spoken to have indicated their desire to raise the property. The area is condusive to the Colonial style properties, so I would keep the house and lift it, but that's just me.

Sea Change - No, it hasn't sold as of this moment. When I posted last I had a serious buyer on the property, but it hasn't happened yet.

It is a sensational property and has attracted attention worldwide. Return is the hard part for investors but it will attract the ultimate in capital growth.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Mike
22-03-2003, 06:42 AM
absolute waterfront property
very rare
will sell very quickly
truly sensational
too good not to let you know about
enormous growth in recent years
this is an extremely rare opportunity
one of Brisbane's fastest growing regions
my prediction is it will be worth $1 mil within 5 years max
My phone hasn't stopped ringing
pretty close to sold
The interest from the forum has been terrific

When I posted last I had a serious buyer on the property, but it hasn't happened yet.

Bottom line is it's genuine waterfront property of Moreton Bay. That alone will see someone pay some extraordinary amount for it.

Hi Kevin,

Just wondering why you have chosen to give us generalisations instead of fact? The reason we need some substantiation is because the next property you advertise here will have a different set of characteristics but if similar terms are also used to describe it there could be a lot of confusion because no two properties are the same, so the saying goes.

Could you clarify what you consider is enormous growth as opposed to average or good growth?

How fast is one of the fastest? In the top ten? Top twenty?

What is the estimated growth rate for the next 5 years? What is that based on? Independent research?

When is a property rare and when is it not rare? How do you tell the difference? If an absolute waterfront is listed once a year, is that rare? Or is rare when it is listed once a month?

When you say the phone hasn't stopped ringing how many calls about that property in an hour or day are you referring to?

What actually is a serious buyer? Is it someone who has inspected the property? Someone with a written offer? Someone with a verbal offer close to the vendor's asking price? Someone who can make a cash offer?

When is a property close to sold? Is it when contracts have exchanged?

If the amount paid for it is extraordinary is it likely to be overpriced?

Regards, Mike

Kevin Hockey
22-03-2003, 08:35 PM
Well thank you Mike, I'll remember your post next time I consider placing an opportunity like this. I cannot post all the info I have with regard to the sale, I have a duty to the owner to act in their best interest, and that I will. I provided an opportunity for everyone to have a look at a potential investment. Considering since beginning on the forum around 3-4 months ago I have listed around 60-80 properties for sale and only posted the one property I don't think it could be said I am using the forum for the benifit of selling property. This is the only occassion (I think) that I have referred to a property for sale.

Let's have a look however at your points and I will attempt to answer them all. Sorry for the length of the post but I can only assume by Mike's post that he feels I am either incompetent, incapable or deceptful.


very rare - it is very rare, do you suggest waterfront property is common.
will sell very quickly - I expected it to do so, and if one of the first 2 offers was accepted it would have been completed in 2 days.
truly sensational - it is
too good not to let you know about - I think it is a great opportunity for an investor who is heavily cashed up and return is not so important but cg is.
enormous growth in recent years. -
18 Flinders - Sold 26/6/87 88,000 - sold 15/10/02 $545,000
land val was 345k, just increased to $475k ( up 130k in 12 months - not bad)
162 Flinders - sold 28/1/82 90k - Sold 29/2/00 475k ucv was 550k now 710k up $160k in 12 months.
208 Flinders sold 23/8/01 250k sold 24/12/01 312k 62k in 4 months
248 Flinders sold 12/10/82 68k - 31/5/93 320k ucv 450k now $580k. 1813m2. From the photo i saw my guess is now worth 800 - 1mil
And there's more but due to length of post I won't continue. Those figures look good to me and in my opinion represent enormous growth considering Brisbane's market.

this is an extremely rare opportunity - I answered that once.

one of Brisbane's fastest growing regions - it is, as the previous figures suggest.

my prediction is it will be worth $1 mil within 5 years max - I stand by that and it is my prediction

My phone hasn't stopped ringing - haven't counted them I am sorry, didn't expect to need to answer to Mike for them

pretty close to sold - I believed it to be the case at the time of the post.

The interest from the forum has been terrific - I have the emails if you need proof

When I posted last I had a serious buyer on the property, but it hasn't happened yet. - It hadn't and hasn't, yet. She said she was away for the weekend and will contact me on Monday.

Just wondering why you have chosen to give us generalisations instead of fact? The reason we need some substantiation is because the next property you advertise here will have a different set of characteristics but if similar terms are also used to describe it there could be a lot of confusion because no two properties are the same, so the saying goes. - I did provide fact plus a description of the property as I see it. Considering the time wasted here I will probably not post another one. It was said at the time that the info provided was acceptable enough FACT to allow it to continue, did it not??

Could you clarify what you consider is enormous growth as opposed to average or good growth? - See above

How fast is one of the fastest? In the top ten? Top twenty? Sorry can't remember the exact articles, however the Courier Mail has on several occasions recently placed it in the top suburbs for growth. I would suggest it is in the top ten, but am prepared to stand corrected. Local papers also have suggested similar.

What is the estimated growth rate for the next 5 years? What is that based on? Independent research? - My job is to sell property for a price that a buyer and seller agree upon today. If an investor wants all these stats about the future I allow them to do their research and due diligence and find out. Who believes a RE agent anyway, right Mike? I stated that my estimation was my prediction, you insinuate that I have guaranteed it. If my suggestion of the future value is too "general" I stand by it based on my experience and the sales I have now posted.

When is a property rare and when is it not rare? How do you tell the difference? If an absolute waterfront is listed once a year, is that rare? Or is rare when it is listed once a month? - You are kidding aren't you? I guess when there is no others available and when they do they normally sell before most buyers get the opportunity to know about it. You seriously don't consider waterfront property as rare??

When you say the phone hasn't stopped ringing how many calls about that property in an hour or day are you referring to? - Sorry, too busy to record them all!!

What actually is a serious buyer? Is it someone who has inspected the property? Someone with a written offer? Someone with a verbal offer close to the vendor's asking price? Someone who can make a cash offer? - All the above except the first one, plus someone who describes a property to me which matches to the property in question, can afford to pay for it and is eaget to purchase immediately. Suggesting that I consider a buyer who just happens to inspect a property is classified serious portrays me to be unprofessional, untrained, inexperienced and/ or downright stupid and I resent it.

When is a property close to sold? Is it when contracts have exchanged? - In Brisbane solicitors do not draw up the contracts and they are not "exchanged" as they are in Southern States. Close to sold, when someone suggests to me they want to make an offer and I know the owner will accept it or is very close to what they want I would suggest it is getting close to being sold. Anything after that would also qualify.

If the amount paid for it is extraordinary is it likely to be overpriced? - What's overpriced. A property is worth what someone is prepared to pay for it. An investor may consider a property to be overpriced based on return etc, but a family who want to make it home may feel it represents great value. So when is it overpriced??

Bottom line is it's genuine waterfront property of Moreton Bay. That alone will see someone pay some extraordinary amount for it.[/COLOR] - Do none of us look at waterfront property in the capital cities of Australia and say to ourselves, aren't they expensive, wish I could afford one of those. Isn't waterfront property often owned by the "Rich and famous". My research showed a property in Flinders Pde previously owned by Wickety Wak and I know a former Australian footballer who lives there. It's not exactly Gold Coast or Manly but it is about as good as it gets in Brisbane.


I hope I have given a satisfactory answer. I apologise to anyone who feels they have been or are being mislead. A local person was always going to be the likely buyer however I truly thought this would be of genuine interest to forumites. Given the reaction I suggest it is. I will post all info with regard to the final sale when able. I accept that by posting I am subject to scrutiny but I expected something more sensible. I don't control the property or the market. If the first offers were accepted maybe (if they had proceeded to settlement) I would have been vindicated. By giving this reply I have further opened myself to criticism, left myself in a position with the owner who may not be so rapt about the info provided and maybe provided personal info on other properties which I shouldn't.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Sim
22-03-2003, 11:01 PM
Kevin, I think you have done a very good job with this thread - questions have been answered, even if not in as much detail as some would prefer, I think most of us respect your duties to your client... and the amount of information has certainly been far greater than most we see in this forum.

I also think some of the questions have been excellent too - I have learnt a lot from this thread both in the questions and the responses given. Well done.

Kevin Hockey
23-03-2003, 07:20 AM
Thank you Sim, I appreciate your comments

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

brains
23-03-2003, 09:49 AM
Kevin,

Are there ANY negatives with this property? The hyperbole & superlatives were overwhelming for what looks to me is a pretty average property.

The house is nothing grand, the block is not huge, the block size & zoning dont have any real potential, the views arent what you would consider outstanding, there is a road to cross to get to the water front?? As seechange says i wouldnt consider it absolute waterfront, this term shouldnt be open to interpretation, it either is abolute waterfront or it isnt.

And i love the way your (and all other agents) 24 hour salesman sign advertise your office more than the property, always makes me chuckle. Must be the only industry that can get away with it.

Im not considering buying this property, just thought id provide some balance and and a bit of reality.

Beside all that, love your work.....:D

Sunstone
23-03-2003, 12:03 PM
Dear Kev,

All threads will have pros and cons, as with all potential opportunities. However this has certainly benefited the forum and I agree with Sim that you have genuinely been trying to answer questions put to yourself about this opportunity.

Thanks for sharing this one.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

Mrs Bird
23-03-2003, 12:13 PM
Hi Kevin,

AS sim mentioned, I to have enjoyed this thread immensley and would be very disappointed if you did not post here again. The only way us Newbies can learn is by reading threads like this and watching more experience investors ask questions that I would never even consider.

In my opinion, anything beachfront near a capital city is rare.
You have put alot of time and effort into this thread, answering all questions and even supplying images for all of us to enjoy!

Looking forward to reading your next opportunity :D

Mrs Bird


:)

asy
23-03-2003, 04:06 PM
I understand what you mean Kev...

I have listed several properties in the last month which I thought might have been interesting to investors, including development sites, and easy reno's...

BUT

I have resisted posting them because I am sick of the continual negativity toward agents, and I fully anticipated those four or five ppl who predominate this to jump on them. So, unfortunately, I didn't post.

In addition to this reason, I worried about preserving the integrity of the forum and not starting advertising property on here that is being sold by agents... (us included.. ;) ) Don't misunderstand me Kev, yours was totally appropriate, in my opinion, it was well done, and lots of information was freely available.

I don't know what the answer is here, I imagine there will be some ppl who would like to see properties posted, if only to have discussion on them...

I have to say, properties are selling quite quickly at the moment, and I'm sure Kev didn't need the advertising for this one, so again, thanks for posting it Kev.

asy :D

Kevin Hockey
23-03-2003, 04:10 PM
Thank you for those who have posted in reply to support me and for the private emails also.

Brains - I appreciate your thoughts, both on this subject and others. We differ in opinions sometimes but what I like is you never insinuate, you call a spade a spade, everyone knows where they stand.

I have answered why I called it absolute, again I stand by that opinion.

As for any negatives, is that what you want your agent to do for you when you sell one day. If I did that you would be the first to scream blue murder for me to take the commission from the owner and then speak derogitively of the property. Secondly, again, any negatives are an opinion by each person. You are right, it isn't zoned for development, it isn't a huge block, but that is not what everyone is after, so who are we to say that it is a negative. As for the house, you said it is nothing grand. It is a nice cottage, if it was something "grand" you would be paying a hell of a lot more because it was grand. You can't have it both ways.

My sign is what it is, a sign to attract buyers attention to the property, sorry if it offends. I except that you weren't pointing that only at me however, but real estate in general. All I can say is it is something you get for free, so don't complain.( although under one system you pay a marketing levy on sale which includes a cost attributed for the sign)

At the end of the day Brains I just knew you were going to pounce on this opportunity. I would like to suggest this to you though. Your profile says you are a plumber or sparky (can't exactly remember now, I actually think you are Neil J in disguise:D ) but their must be rotten eggs that you know in your industry and good people too. Real Estate is no different, not everyone is what you want to believe them to be. I know some very good people in real estate and they don't deserve to be placed in the same category as those that are not.

Thanks again everyone for your input and I look forward to bringing this to a conclusion very soon I hope.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Kevin Hockey
23-03-2003, 04:26 PM
Hi Asy,

I would like to point out at this time there has been 49 replies and 1908 views to this post. I would suggest this shows there is a place for it.

I have no problem with being questioned or scrutinised over any posting I make on this forum. If I am out of line I deserve to be told so. I just expect someone, as Brains does, to be direct with it and to put their opinions on line as I do.

Asy I think if it is something "special" and is of genuine interest to the investors of the forum, it should stand in my opinion. In saying that I am unsure about doing so next time myself. But that may not be a bad thing. I'll know it will have to be a genuine, A class opportunity or I'm going to face scrutiny again.

I receive a lot by being part of this forum, posting a "rare" opportunity is my way of giving back.

Go the Aussies in tonight's World Cup final. Another late night coming for me.

Have a good one.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

brains
23-03-2003, 04:36 PM
Asy & Kevin,

Point taken and yes ive been burnt big time by RE agents when i was a bit greener than i am now. I find it hard to conceal my feelings for the industry in general ( but not at any specific agent).

Maybe i should get over it, but it would be easier if the RE industry stops its ways that i consider would be unacceptable in any other industry but taken as totally normal in this one.

Ive have no connection with NJ, i only admire what he does and the fact that he is the only one doing it on a major level.

What you propose is a dilemna thats hard to reconcile, as a vendor i would want an agent to get maximum price for me but if he lied to do it, im not sure how id feel about it but probably wouldnt like it, but i sure wouldnt tell him to return the cheque.:)

Because in general i dont lie, ive been running and growing my own successful business for close to 10 years now without lying or deception.

My feeling is if i cant get something without lying, i dont want it.

I think if you are thinking long term this is the way to go and these days my business recieves its work from referrals and word of mouth which vindicates my original decison.

Not saying you guys lie, but i dont think ive met or done business with an agent that doesnt.

I see that house has been on the market for about a month now, do you think it might be overpriced?

Les
23-03-2003, 04:38 PM
G'day Kev,

I too would like to thank you for posting this - as anyone reading can see from your post count, you are certainly no "fly-by-night" poster who places an ad on their first day in the forum. To me, this gives you a lot more credence than others that post in CE. And you certainly jumped thru a lot of hoops for us (e.g. getting to grips with HOW to post a picture, responding to everyone's questions, etc.)

You certainly did your best to offer this with the best of intentions, so, like so many before me, let me say I appreciated your effort and time given to this.

Like Brains, this one was never going to be "for me" - but we can all learn so much just from reading about such offers.

Thanks again,

Regards,

brains
23-03-2003, 04:46 PM
Just as an aside, Residex predicts a growth rate for Sandgate for the next 5 years of 6% pa average, pretty low for anywhere in Brisbane. Residex is rarely wrong but maybe the waterfronts will achieve better growth than the suburb in general.

So i hope a couple of questioning and sceptical posts dont stop you guys from posting what might be some good investing opportunities for forumites. (Not for me, im done with QLD, land tax issues, RE issues, god-so many issues.:D

And you guys sound like veteran RE industry people so shouldnt be too bothered by a bit of sceptical questioning from prospective buyers.

A late one for me as well, i want the Aussies to win of course but i love watching the little master Tendulkar bat.

Kevin Hockey
23-03-2003, 05:06 PM
Thanks Brains,

I lost a listing last week to an agency because the owner was prepared to deal, knowingly, with an agency who is in my opinion the worst I have seen. They are despicable. But the owner knows they lie so badly to a buyer they will achieve at times, higher prices. They will over inflate their rental appraisal, suggest unreal attributes and at times buyers will believe it. Their reputation is abysmal and they can't keep staff, but still people go to them.

I fully understand how you feel. My business is built on all the same standards as yours. My repeat and referral business is very high, just like yours. All I ask of you is not to judge myself and my colleagues by the standards set by others.

As for the price, it is hard to comment on that at this time. The property has been on for 3 weeks yesterday. What I will say is that original expectations by the owner was for over $600k. It has been listed now for 1 1/2 weeks for $595,000 and the owners are now suggesting the property be marketed at a price reflecting closer to the mid 500's (550k+). I would like to suggest 3-4 weeks is not an unreasonable time frame for a property to be sold in.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

bundy1964
23-03-2003, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by brains
A late one for me as well, i want the Aussies to win of course but i love watching the little master Tendulkar bat.

I hope you didn't blink brains ;)

bundy

brains
24-03-2003, 07:31 AM
haha...I went to bed after the Aussie innings cause i knew the Indians just werent going to get there.

Mike
24-03-2003, 10:44 AM
Hi Folks,

I'm not into REA bashing and certainly am not trying to put Kevin off from posting more deals. I have a view and that is I don't think Kevin presented the deal in an unbiased way. Thanks to some good questioning from some people we got a more balanced view of the deal. Ironically, if the deal had been presented in the first place with most of the issues covered then there shouldn't be any need for debate at all. Lots of questions to the poster is usually a sign that the deal wasn't posted with enough details in the first place.

Now I will present two examples of what I believe is a better way to present a deal to this forum.

The first example is a deal posted to the Singing Pig forum by Lisa Orme who is an investor herself and knows what info about a property would appeal to an investor. I was so impressed I replied with "Lisa, you can post as many deals as you like if they are written as well this one."

Hi all,

I debated long and hard about whether to put this on here as I am concious of this forum turning into WalMart!!!

However, I think it is a good deal to analyse for the newbies perhaps as I have included lots of information and I have posted on some other sites and wouldn't want the piggies to miss out. Furthermore, I do not object to anyone analysing the deal!

If anyone objects them I'm happy to remove it.

I have been checking out the following rental opportunity for purchase; for business reasons I have decided not to buy (nothing to do with the deal). I think its an excellent opportunity for a newbie or more experienced investor alike so thought I would pass on.

Complete freehold for sale of a property in a suburb of Coventry. Approx. 3 miles from City Centre and half a mile from the M6 motorway. Typically working class area not a dive but not the poshest either.

Building converted to flats and studios:

1 x 2 bed flat currently let at 75 pw
2 x 1 bed flats currently let at 65 pw
2 x studios currently let at 60 pw

The flats all include kitchens and bathrooms and living rooms. The studios include private kitchenette and bathrooms. All have private entrances. There is a private parking area for 6 vehicles and a laundry area. This was originally some kind of office/builders merchants as I understand but was converted by present owner in early 90's. It is a large corner site and could offer future potential for knock down and redevelopment if that's your game.

The rents havent been increased since 1994!!

Most of the tenants have been in place for 4 to 6 years. One of the studios is currently unlet.

Conservative estimate of possible rents are:

studios 300 pcm
1 beds 350 pcm
2 beds 400 pcm

The agent said it does require a bit of a refurb as tenants havent moved out in so long but it is well looked after.

I have chatted at length with the owner/seller.

He is in his 70s and looking to sell the properties he has he has already disposed of most.

He said the tenancy agreements have long since gone but he can arrange for new ASTs (Assured Shorthold Tenancy) prior to sale or even offer it empty by giving all the tenants notice if the buyer prefers.

He said he is happy to continue looking after the grounds and general maintenance issues if the buyer would like for the next twelve months or so until the buyer has someone else in place.

The asking price is 205k. He will take 200k but no lower didnt try too hard at this stage though.

15% deposit is 30k.
5% IO on 170k = 708 pcm
Current rents = 1409 pcm (just under 17k pa)
Current Yield = 8.5%
ROI = 28%
Potential rents = 1700 + pcm
Potential Yield = 10.2% +
ROI = 40% +

This is up with an agent but they are very flexible about you speaking direct to seller as I did. Seller isnt interested in any creative financing, deposits paid, etc etc (he said hes too old!!)

Kind regards, Lisa

The key issues that Lisa addressed were:

condition of the property; location; type of block; demographic; previous conversion work; development potential; current tenancy status; some vendor details; asking price; investment analysis.

Now my second example is presenting Kevin's deal as it could have been presented in the first place. It is a combination of some info Kevin provided and some additional info supplied by some of our members.

About the property:

absolute waterfront property today in Sandgate

has clear, unobstructed views of Moreton Bay and Redcliffe

The house is a 3 bedroom colonial cottage Queenslander with new kitchen.

Land size is 511m2.

The property is semi-highset, around 1 metre (3 foot) off the ground.

The zoning will be Res A. The site wouldn't be large unough for units anyway nor would the frontage.

The area is condusive to the Colonial style properties, so I would keep the house and lift it, but that's just me.

Return will be low.

I am expecting it to rent for 300-350 pw.

The sale of a property further down the street recently for $550,000 suggests this should sell above $600,000 and probably below $650,000.

Capital gain of nearby properties:

18 Flinders - Sold 26/6/87 88,000 - sold 15/10/02 $545,000 (12-13% pa over 15 years)
land val was 345k, just increased to $475k ( up 130k in 12 months - not bad)
162 Flinders - sold 28/1/82 90k - Sold 29/2/00 475k ucv was 550k now 710k up $160k in 12 months.
208 Flinders sold 23/8/01 250k sold 24/12/01 312k 62k in 4 months
248 Flinders sold 12/10/82 68k - 31/5/93 320k ucv 450k now $580k. 1813m2. From the photo i saw my guess is now worth 800 - 1mil

About Sandgate:

Sandgate is an old suburb about 15km north of CBD. It looks straight out over Moreton Bay. Sandgate has undergone major changes in recent years with bikeways, gardens, cafes etc. Every weekend it is packed with people walking their dogs, having lunch etc and playing with the kids.

Traditionally it has been an area dominated by elderly people however that trend has changed significantly and is now very popular with the "Dinks" and "Yuppies".

The waterfront at Sandgate doesn't have sand, and for years it was just a wall to hold back the tides. Yes you do have to cross the road to get to the waterfront. There has been a heap of improvments done over the last ten or so years and it is a very nice area now.

Up the Sandgate end there are parks and BBQ areas availiable and then a short walk further around there is the Shorncliffe pier which has became quite popular in recent times.
A bikeway runs along the full length of the front from the bridge to Redcliffe up and around to the pier. Very sought after now, Sandgate has also been going thru an upgrade (see BCC plans) so to speak and is becoming very nice little town.

Originally most of the houses along the front were just your normal run of the mill colonials with a few exceptional old places there (some ex-flats that have been done up etc). But over the last ten years they have either been done up to the nines or knocked down to make way for some really quite exceptional houses. It is a very nice place to be now!

A little bit more statistical info on Sandgate.

Capital Growth in:
March 2002 quarter: 10%
June 2002 quarter: -4%
Sept 2002 quarter: 6.77%

Median price Sept 2002 $244,505

Average rental for 4017 postcode (Includes Bracken Ridge/Brighton/Deagon/Sandgate)(December 2002 RTA figures)
: $200/week.

Gross yield for the suburb 4.25%

About 32 minutes on the train to central station.

*****************************************

If the deal could have been presented like this in the first place why wasn't it? I hope Kevin and Asy do post deals in the future and I'm sure they will be much better received if presented as these two examples are - as unbiased and informative as possible.

Regards, Mike

see_change
24-03-2003, 11:21 AM
Sorry to pedantic Mike

But

The Property is opposite waterfront , with never to be built out views.

It is NOT Absolute Waterfront and Kevins insistance on calling it such is incorrect.

When I've looked at properties , the distintion between those descriptions can mean a doubling of the price of the property, and if some one was to use that as a way of comparing prices this properties with Absolute Waterfront properties else where, they could get an incorrect opinion of the value of the property .

I am not implying that this isn't a good buy , and I have looked at the area from sandgate / shorncliffe up to redcliffe and I am seriously thinking of buying there at some stage ( and I am kicking myself for not buying ther 18 months ago when I looked , but you can't buy every where ) I think it is a good area to buy if your looking for capital growth .

BUT this is not an Absolute Waterfront Property.

See change

Sim
24-03-2003, 11:28 AM
For the sake of pedanticity (and the chance to invent new words) - I agree with see_change on this one.

My own definition of absolute water frontage is where your back yard is in the water, not where your front yard looks across the road to the water.

XBenX
24-03-2003, 12:12 PM
This cant be a real agent bashing - I havent even been involved !

Another good CE thread - Mike I see your point re details - it would be nice (and more transparent if they were posted initially) yet we dont expect real estate agents to play fair, even if they are one of the "good guys"

At least it wasnt as bad as some of the other sales threads in CE.

Kev - nice works on all the "re butt als " (for sim) your replies showed you were serious about posting an opportunity and not just looking for another method for flogging property (even if there was lots of agent speak in there)

Kevmeister
24-03-2003, 12:24 PM
I don't want to support one side or the other here, just put forward my own perspective.

It seems to me that often we are trying to get those people posting deals to also do some of our due diligence for us. I don't know where one should draw the line.

I guess that because this is a forum for property investors one can fully expect that many of the due-diligence issues are going to get addressed. The amount of negativity surprises me (the new posters cop it most - perhaps justifiably).

Mike has a very good post. The salient point is that the person advertising the deal has virtually put themselves into the shoes of a prospective buyer. Very few seem to do this on Caveat Emptor. But how much info can a seller give before they are not acting in the vendor's interests, but rather the buyer's interest? Is posting recent sales information acting in the seller's interest (maybe, if the house is a dump and other sales give the impression it's a cheap buy - maybe not, if other sales in the area are $100K below this asking price).

That would suggest that sellers should realise more "what they are letting themselves in for" and have a reasonable understanding of what they should be posting. So, are the guidelines for Caveat Emptor actually adequate?

Certainly I would suggest that in any RE agent's case they are going to have to put a lot more preparation into trying to sell on this forum than in the local paper. Essentially you must provide a. only the facts, and b. lots of detail. A big ad.

The way "buyers" address Caveat Emptor is in some ways incompatible with the ways "sellers" address Caveat Emptor. Sellers want to sell, and they will use that same selling language as you'll get in the newspaper. Buyers want facts. In fact buyers on this forum want more facts than the agent may actually present them with face-to-face.

Where does the selling stop and the due-diligence begin? I can clearly see why nearly every deal on Caveat Emptor gets a thrashing.

PS: with respect to Mike's post, I can almost imagine that, if it were posted here, we'd be getting comments like: "Who determined the realistic rental for each unit?". At the end of the day, sometimes a seller can't provide all the details without the buyer being skeptical, simply because they *are* the seller.

Kevin Hockey
01-04-2003, 08:08 PM
This property has gone under contract over the weekend. As is often the case we ended up with multiple offers for the owners to choose from. The contract is not yet unconditional, I can let you know price and details when it does.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

XBenX
02-04-2003, 12:06 PM
mulitple offers to choose from ?

did they take the highest offer ?

or were they one of those - i want it to go to a nice family type ppl ?

fill us in when its unconditional :)

Kevin Hockey
02-04-2003, 07:42 PM
Originally posted by XBenX
mulitple offers to choose from ?

did they take the highest offer ?

or were they one of those - i want it to go to a nice family type ppl ?

fill us in when its unconditional :)

Sorry Ben, not sure if it is your post or just me being stupid. What is your post suggesting.

There was more than one offer and they chose the one which suited them the most. As you would expect that is the one which was in fact the highest in price.

Should be unconditional in around 12 days.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

XBenX
03-04-2003, 02:02 PM
Kev,

Sorry for being so vague :)

I did want to know if they accepted the highest offer.

Thanks,

X

Kevin Hockey
24-04-2003, 08:54 PM
This sale proved to be one of the 2 most difficult in my career. On both of those occassions one particular bank seemed to be at the centre of the controversy. I'm not going to mention Westpac's name either. This time it took 22 days to approve finance and only after much pressure was applied. Approval came through just yesterday and we are supposed to settle on Monday. Valuations weren't ordered until last Friday, 2 days after approval date. Then 2 days later they order more vals after saying they wouldn't need them. The last time I had to deal with them it took 6 weeks for approval of finance and the buyer was a high ranking govt official. When they did the vals that time, after 4 weeks, they valued the wrong property.

I don't mind making these statements as this time the buyer has recorded everything and is making an official complaint after settlement. Someone needs to be accountable from the banks.

The property has now gone unconditional and it was sold for $550,000. There was some strong lessons learnt in this sale, none more so than your first offer is often the best, even when it is just hours after going to the market. 2 properties were undersold close by and had a detrimental effect on the sale of this one but the eventual sale price was my original estimate. Mind you I sold one today for $295k and I thought it would go around $270k. There was another offer for $280k so a property is worth the highest price a buyer is prepared to pay.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Rolf Latham
24-04-2003, 09:26 PM
Hi Kev

Congratulations on the sale !

WeSuck as we affectionately call them are no better or worse than the other big 3.

The common problem is a lack of pro activity from whomever is obtaining the finance, however to be fair there are instances where it can take 14 days max to get finance put to bed if its driven.

YEP, Scream and document since the buggers need to know what their inaction is causing their client base.

Ta

rolf

asy
24-04-2003, 09:28 PM
Thanks Kev...

Thanks for letting us know what the outcome was.

asy :D

Kevin Hockey
25-04-2003, 06:19 AM
Originally posted by Rolf Latham
Hi Kev

Congratulations on the sale !

WeSuck as we affectionately call them are no better or worse than the other big 3.

The common problem is a lack of pro activity from whomever is obtaining the finance, however to be fair there are instances where it can take 14 days max to get finance put to bed if its driven.

YEP, Scream and document since the buggers need to know what their inaction is causing their client base.

Ta

rolf

Thanx Rolf,

I have only ever had "major" problems with 1 bank. I do have a lot of experience in establishing a buyers capabilities in getting a loan, my wife was 16 years with a major and I have always taken an interest in this area so I could establish how much time I need to spend with a buyer. This loan was not a difficult one, there was no LMI to start with. This isn't about how long it took but the incompetency which forced it to take so long. I don't accept that they are no worse than the other 3. If the loan at that bank goes through Adelaide the problem levels appear to significantly increase.

I accept that sometimes it takes all 14 days and on rare occassions a little longer, but in this instance it shouldn't have and for what reason would you not order the vals until after finance date. God forbid anyone who uses this avenue for finance in my opinion. The trail of devastation which has been left behind has been a disgrace.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Sunstone
25-04-2003, 02:21 PM
Dear Kev,

Likewise congrat's on making the sale and thanks for making a real effort on this one. Credibly letting us know the opportunity and the eventual outcome is appreciated.

Cheers,

Sunstone.

Andrew_A
12-01-2005, 08:27 PM
What a great thread. Some very revealing posts here.

I would say whoever bought this house would be VERY happy right now. And would I be right in assuming that like all quality/luxury property within visible range of water this 1x550k house would have outperformed the higher yielding 2x275k properties or 5x110k properties a few streets back within the same timeframe?

I just love reading the negative/sceptical comments in this post! It's true you could hand a treasure map to a room of people and some will ask how hard they will have to dig!

markpatric
12-01-2005, 09:34 PM
With regard to what is absolute beachfront, IMO absolute beachfront is absolute beachfront, no road or anything else.
Also my version of beach means sand not mud. :rolleyes: :)
All things considered and from what I have seen of Sandgate, I would not argue too much with absolute mudfront!. :)

Sultan of Swing
12-01-2005, 10:22 PM
An intersting thread. I've just finished reading it.

Remind me to never post any properties that are for sale on SS!! :p

Kev, what would you consider this property to be worth now, almost 2 years later??

Cheers

Kevin Hockey
12-01-2005, 10:53 PM
An intersting thread. I've just finished reading it.

Remind me to never post any properties that are for sale on SS!! :p

Kev, what would you consider this property to be worth now, almost 2 years later??

Cheers

Jeez,

Glad I brought this up again :D

Sadly only a month after moving them into a lovely villa and Glenn got to buy his new car he passed away. I am still in touch with Thelma.

Price now, damn sight lot more than it went for back then. Prices have now hit the million mark. The property next door has since sold for $907,000.

Who gives a flying f... (toss) whether it is absolute or whatever the bloody hell ya want to call it. Its waterfront with "absolute" clear views which can never be built out.

I came so close to walking from this forum over this post so lets not go here again.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.au

Andrew_A
12-01-2005, 10:57 PM
So was I right with my assumptions about it's performance Kev compared to less well placed property in the same area?

My observation of the Gold Coast is that while all property has done well nothing has done as well as the really quality stuff with water views that will never be built out.

Andrew_A
12-01-2005, 11:01 PM
Jeez,

Glad I brought this up again :D

Sadly only a month after moving them into a lovely villa and Glenn got to buy his new car he passed away. I am still in touch with Thelma.

Price now, damn sight lot more than it went for back then. Prices have now hit the million mark. The property next door has since sold for $907,000.

Who gives a flying f... (toss) whether it is absolute or whatever the bloody hell ya want to call it. Its waterfront with "absolute" clear views which can never be built out.

I came so close to walking from this forum over this post so lets not go here again.

Kev

www.nundahrealestate.com.auDoesn't seem to be unusual. Peter Spann came on here and provided a whole range of fantastic posts and personal insights as an investor; all for free. And some people thought he was just here to boost book sales.

Human nature.

XBenX
13-01-2005, 09:09 AM
This cant be a real agent bashing - I havent even been involved !

Another good CE thread - Mike I see your point re details - it would be nice (and more transparent if they were posted initially) yet we dont expect real estate agents to play fair, even if they are one of the "good guys"

At least it wasnt as bad as some of the other sales threads in CE.

Kev - nice works on all the "re butt als " (for sim) your replies showed you were serious about posting an opportunity and not just looking for another method for flogging property (even if there was lots of agent speak in there)

Whilst Ive mellowed in my "old" age - I think this post sums the thread up well... (maybe a few additional :P 's are needed)

Everyone asked the hard qn's and Kev did a stand up job of answering all the q's (even the provocative from my "old" mate brains =P)

Kev -there were a few posts in the thread letting you know we appreciate your contributions - everyone was just asking the hard questions like all investors do. Im sure you ask the same qn's when you purchase an IP.

It is a hard thing to allocate our investment choices in the most efficient manner to minimise opportunity cost.

Not that I even considered buying the property but even with hindsight I wouldnt have bought it - my money could have been used more effectively elsewhere...