RP data subscription - Brisbane
- Thread starter Andrew_A
- Start date
Does anyone have any idea how to find out the current owner? I was led to believe (not by Andrew A) that RP Data had ownership details, but so far it seems all they mean by that is previous owners. Well that's completely useless...! I hope somewhere it shows the current owner's details, but I just can't find it.
Hi Andrew.
Are you planning to split that cost with others to whom you supply the log-in details?
If so, how many people would be on the share list?
thanks
it has the current owners details unless sold in the last 6-8 weeks or so. takes about that long for titles office to update and then show up on RP.
the other way is to do a title search here:
http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/property/titles/searchregisters.html but it costs per search.
Actually Ianvestor, I use it a dozen times a day and can tell you that the ownership data is there. give me your address and I will send you your property info complete with name to prove it.
I don't know why I get them and you apparently can't except that the subscription I use is a developer/real estate agent subscription and not a private syndicate.
no the title searches are not included, they can be done through RPdata but it is only a technical link through to the titles database and you have to pay at the time of the search or load up the credit prior.
I don't know why I get them and you apparently can't except that the subscription I use is a developer/real estate agent subscription and not a private syndicate.
no the title searches are not included, they can be done through RPdata but it is only a technical link through to the titles database and you have to pay at the time of the search or load up the credit prior.
Well, I followed the help file exactly, and even used the exact example address in the help file: 87 Honour Av, Chelmer. My results on that search looked quite similar to the screenshot in the help file, except mine didn't show the current owner.
Also strange, if you can do that all day UC, why did a staff member tell me it's against the privacy act? Weird.
I'd love to see a screenshot of that particular address at Chelmer via your login if you have the time, please email it to me at [email protected]
In other news, Andrew is getting my account 'reset'. So I'll see if there are any differences tonight...
Thanks,
Ian
no probs mate - I don't doubt for a second that you believe what you've been told/seen, I am just pointing out that it is not entirely correct.
I have sent you the email as requested, not a screenshot, but close to it. All I have done is type the address in, hit the go button and used the print option to print to PDF. The ownership details are most certainly there.
hope this helps some...and I hope you can get it sorted. be interested to know what the issue is in case it crops up again.
let me know if it is different to what you see.
cheers
UC
I have sent you the email as requested, not a screenshot, but close to it. All I have done is type the address in, hit the go button and used the print option to print to PDF. The ownership details are most certainly there.
hope this helps some...and I hope you can get it sorted. be interested to know what the issue is in case it crops up again.
let me know if it is different to what you see.
cheers
UC
Thanks for that... my screen shows an almost identical result - without the 'owner' box. In fact I decided to go to 'Print Friendly' to see if it would show up there... I was presented with a whole heap of check boxes for what I want to show on the Print Friendly version. There is actually a checkbox for ownership, but it's greyed out, and I can't put a tick in it. I guess we'll have to get on to them again and ask what the deal is.
Glad it all worked out for you. Agents are bound under extra provisions of different acts including pamda that don't apply to the general public.
I don't know the exact reasons for general publics inability to access the data, but I suspect that is part of it.
I don't know the exact reasons for general publics inability to access the data, but I suspect that is part of it.
