Hi House_Keeper
I see this is an old thread, but your comment today has raised some questions for me. I respect your thoughts, and still consider myself as having a LOT to learn, so with little trepidation, I ask;
"I have also noticed that, in many areas, property prices tend to go in jumps, then plateau for a while. What is the point of holding a property during a plateau? If you have done the research to identify another area that is likely to "jump", you might as well put your equity towards that."...
In order to acquire a continual portfolio, isn't it better to hold a property through more than 1 peak (encompassing a plateau or two), and reap the capital appreciation over more than 1 cycle, than to sell and start over agian, making it more difficult (perhaps through the loss of momentum (passion/courage) and equity) to get back into the market?
Also, isn't the identification of areas of projected growth only ever a "prediction" until it becomes a reality through statistics? As you mentioned, it is dependant on each individuals' circumstances as some investors might benefit more through the "a bird in the hand is worth two..." scenario over the long term?
See_Change - "Any one who tells you that it's time in the market that matters and not timing , has rocks in their head."
For some - the right "timing" might never come - fear might be the only inhibitor to getting into investing - in which case - they will ALWAYS find a reason NOT to invest. I appreciate we should all try to buy at the right time, however, do those people who buy at the high point of the cycle have any les chance at success, given that it might be the best chance to take advantage of other conditions at that point?
I would value additional comments.