I am reading one of Jan Somers books at the moment (More wealth from residential property) and came across an interesting paragraph or two about advantages of having boarders and whether you should declare their rent as income. She said that more often than not you would be better claiming at as income as you can then claim back many things around the home on tax. I would be interested to hear if anyone has/is doing this. Here are some figures I have been playing around with:
Mortgage repayments: $1950
Interest Component: $1700
4 People living in home (2 owners/2 boarders)
Boarders paying $100 each per week and all utilities split evenly
Without declaring boarders income:
52 x $200 = $10,400 profit
With declaring boarders income:
Boarders rent received per year: $10,400
Interest paid over year: $20,400 (claim only half $10200)
Rates/water/insurance: $2000 (claim only half $1000)
- 30% of boarders for tax ($3120) + around 30% of interest/rates back ($3360)
$10640 Profit
Seems that you would be barely making a difference between declaring or not decalring? Am I missing something blatantly obvious here or would it only be better to declare in some situations?
Mortgage repayments: $1950
Interest Component: $1700
4 People living in home (2 owners/2 boarders)
Boarders paying $100 each per week and all utilities split evenly
Without declaring boarders income:
52 x $200 = $10,400 profit
With declaring boarders income:
Boarders rent received per year: $10,400
Interest paid over year: $20,400 (claim only half $10200)
Rates/water/insurance: $2000 (claim only half $1000)
- 30% of boarders for tax ($3120) + around 30% of interest/rates back ($3360)
$10640 Profit
Seems that you would be barely making a difference between declaring or not decalring? Am I missing something blatantly obvious here or would it only be better to declare in some situations?