Search results

So because of the court order, the normal rules in terms of who can remove a caveat do not apply? The LPI website and several other sources say that ONLY a caveator or caveator's solicitor (or someone representing him) can withdraw a caveat. Again, the caveat is already removed now... it is...

I might also add that early on, my solicitor made it very clear to me that the caveat had to be removed before he would let exchange happen... that is why I contacted the agent about getting it removed, so the agent handled that by contacting the owner's solicitor and them submitting it, and I...

I have a copy of the court order, it says: 11. The caveat number AExxxxxx lodged in relation to the property be withdrawn. But in in the 4+ months since the court order, the caveator had done nothing. It is possible he had no intention of removing it either. I cannot find any mention on the...

But what about the court order saying it needed to be withdrawn? Was it not supposed to be removed anyway? The problem is, I was not made aware of *how* this was done, until it was already done. I do not know why the owner's solicitor did this instead of the caveator or his solicitor.

I never saw the form that was submitted or what was written on it, as it was done in Sydney by the owner's solicitor. I have had a look on the template form on the LPI website but I don't see anything to answer my question. What happened was - the agent contacted the owner's solicitor about...

I am in the middle of purchasing a property which has had a caveat on it. The caveat has been in place since mid-2009. The caveat is in relation to money owed to the caveator by the owner of the property, which actually totals more than the property's current value. There was a court order in...