Search results

  1. A

    generational housing problem

    Hi Steve, Buying an asset that you expect to turn cashflow positive in the short term is what real estate investment is about. :) The problem that I see (again this is just personally opinion) for example is a house that has sold recently near me for $650K. It is now being advestised...
  2. A

    generational housing problem

    Hi Arkay, It's not a mindset just a definition and people who purchase an asset purely for the gain in said asset price are speculators. This is not really something that can be debated. This isn't a bad thing and if people are competely aware and comfortable with their level of risk I'm sure...
  3. A

    generational housing problem

    I agree. I think it's the short term view and the lack of capacity to REALLY service the loans that will cause the problem. And I'm afraid to say that from my experience a largish number of more recent purchasers fit this description. :(
  4. A

    generational housing problem

    Hi Dave, I wasn't saying anyone here had bought overvalued property, just my first hand experience amongst friend etc. No I ment speculators. If you buy an asset hoping to make a profit from an increase in the asset price you are a speculator. Steveadl's example where an asset costs him $2K...
  5. A

    generational housing problem

    Hi Steveadl, The problem with the example you gave is that a large percentage of speculators are not taking a long term view. Many people I know have purchased properties with the plan of selling them off in 3-5 years and retiring filthy rich. I'm sure everyone agrees that LONG term...
  6. A

    $6000 tax incentive ...

    See that's the problem, they're not really increasing at double digits. Wages aren't so rents never will. This rents rising at 20% rubbish has already been debunked. See: http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1857681.htm Poor yields does not equal rental increases. Most current...
  7. A

    $6000 tax incentive ...

    Greedy tenants??? Rents have kept track with wages so how have they had it too good? Aren't most investors also getting a discount at taxpayers expense through negative gearing?
Back
Top