Search results

  1. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    Could just cover it with a conc sewer manhole set.
  2. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    i would have thought it would be in the perfect spot.....?
  3. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    Maybe it was Dazz.
  4. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    Yep - easiest way for peeps to think about it is... We have a bill and a motion. We have it thru the house of reps. Now we fine tune it before being voted on in the senate. Simples.
  5. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    they have a policy that allows them to implement it. they haven't done it yet because they want some conditions for approving the higher density. sounds pretty normal to me - from a policy point of view.
  6. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    your boundary must be 1.0m from the rear of the house (if no bedroom / living room windows in the wall OR wall is under 9m long) or 1.5m from the rear of the house (opposite of previous criteria). allowable encroachments is covered in the new National Code of Construction (NCC) now, not the...
  7. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    1.5m from the rear of the house wall - odds are there's a habitable room window along the back there. 3.7.1.7 must relate to the BCA - now the NCC. Will have to find the new clause.
  8. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    okay cool - adopted March last year. can't find a policy in place just yet - these are "guidelines" inside a statement of intent. http://online.planning.wa.gov.au/LPS/data/Local%20Planning%20Schemes/Kalamunda%20-%20Shire%20of%20%28Scheme%203%29/Map%2003%20-%20Forrestfield%20Locality.pdf...
  9. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    it seems only the draft local housing strategy mentions R20/30 - pretty much 2 years old today. is the lot you are looking at CURRENTLY R20/30, or R20? R20/30 is the bright green area in the DLHS. the DLHS is investigating how to allow the upcode, what criteria is required etc...
  10. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    most lots with development potential in Belmont are split coded - R20/40 and R20/50/100 the most common of those.
  11. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    .... "pro development" meaning "as long as you comply with 5.7.3 of the TPS". note the 'and' at the end of every sub-clause - not "and/or", "or" etc. must comply with each and every clause.
  12. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    no. nothing is a foregone conclusion until the Government Gazette is released. no mergers are likely.
  13. Aaron Sice

    First IP - looking at Forrestfield WA

    I would suggest to stay on a lot over 450sqm so you can either attach an ancillary dwelling later, or subdivide @ R40. There will be lots of rental potential in FF / HW over the coming years.
Back
Top