Search results

i think this thread has de-evolved into this being the answer for every post now.

...uh...because it's a cost of doing business with a REA? geez, next they will have to absord the bond money as well. they could always claim it against their tax bill and only charge the tenant 68.5% of the cost, but then your taxes payable would rise to cover it, or their fee would go up...

well they could have done a privte sale and the REA would have had nothing...count his lucky stars he was able to dupe the owners into paying for his "superior service" or whatever....