Search results

  1. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Lawyers don't earn that much....seriously speaking.
  2. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Agreed Dazz. Not even for $300,000 these days and people expect you to be on call with the Blackberry and coming in on weekends.
  3. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Because the FHOG is compensation for the taxation effect of the GST. So by removing it you are basically having higher taxes.
  4. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Boomers when they retire won't be negatively geared anywhere near the extent of the younger generations.
  5. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    It's Gabbana. Not the meat stick :)
  6. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Wasn't the FHOG meant to compensate home owners for the GST in 2000 since developers had to charge GST?
  7. A

    The Abolishment of the Negative Gearing Debate

    Not quite because everyone has to live in Toorak otherwise it's just considered un-Australian to be pushed into suburbia.
Back
Top