Search results

  1. A

    Lance Armstrong

    Yes but the principle behind banning cocaine is different from EPO. It is false to say 'oh they are both banned substances so they are equivalent'...????
  2. A

    Lance Armstrong

    How is that relevant? Cocaine is not a performance enhancing drug. EPO is.
  3. A

    Lance Armstrong

    The excuse that 'everyone was doing it' is childish and if you are doping, you deserved to be shamed and your records expunged from history.
  4. A

    Lance Armstrong

    What I find most interesting is the blood transfusion - taking out your own blood in the off-season and then pumping it back into yourself during the race. Amazing stuff.
  5. A

    Lance Armstrong

    So is it better to have cheated, won and then get caught - or not cheated, never won and remain clean?
  6. A

    Lance Armstrong

    An accomplice is as guilty as the perpetrator.
Back
Top