Search results

  1. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    it may be a misconception however this is the stuff of banana republics.... ousting a legitimiate PM on a party whim, incredible!
  2. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    well the prime minister that was voted in had an agenda of a big australia. Our new PM unelect has a differing vision. your statement is at complete odds with what the public actually elected. btw how much longer must we endure this unmandated government?
  3. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    unfortunately you are probably right WW. even more unfortunately for Perth, Darwin and Brisb, the old WW2 border would probably be redrawn, whereby the aussies would be allowed to reside in the south east corner. the resources will need to be surrendered.
  4. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    that'd be fine - somewhere like phoenix or vegas, i love the heat. places like broome are awesome climates
  5. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    ord river is huge to start with. apart from that, nuclear powered desal. tho tassie could take 40 or 50 million without batting an eyelid where do indonesians get their water from?
  6. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    i agree BC. the lack of vision astounds me, but australia is notorious for that. populate or perish - it's as simple as that. This country WILL be 200 million - it's just a matter of which government controls it. i would rather controlled growth under a western system
  7. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    why do you believe we need to be so independant in agricultural production? what can London grow? this country should be able to hold a good 500 million spread across it
  8. A

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    We could put 50 million into Kunnunurra no probs. why is everyone so scared and awed by these sorts of numbers? how can it be feasible for our existing miniscule population to remain occupants of an entire continent?
Back
Top