Search results

  1. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    their are several people contributing to renters' love nests. A major one is bank depositors, then taxpayers along with the asset holder
  2. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    Depends what your net holding cost after tax is balanced against debt deflation and capital growth... is hard to see how you can lose except in a dire deflationary situation. If your cashflow can support it I would suggest leveragign to the max. From that I can't see how many of them are suckers...
  3. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    is a bit dismissive of a lot of peoples best endeavours... why call them suckers, their investment could work out very well for them?
  4. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    Rollicking bonkers indeed. Personally I would love it - renters should foot the bill for their accommodation not taxpayers. and there is no god given right for a 4 x 2 with a pool.
  5. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    yes indeed. none of it is my problem but it suggests we are living beyond our means if as a nation we can't afford the rent on our 4x2's with outdoor kitchen
  6. A

    Is it the end of negative gearing

    rents need to go to a free market rate which is about double where they sit now. when there is a fair ROI then developers will build more to supply the market. the market needs to be allowed to operate, not constantly stuffed around
Back
Top