Search results

Yeah, I realised that after my post - I thought it referred to the whole of the Bay. I'm clueless. Even so, I think their criteria needs to be looked at.

From those points you mentioned they rank the quality of life based on things like how many renters compared to o/o's, how much employment compared to unemployment and type of accommodation. For me; none of those things make a quality of life rating for where I live. It's all about...

As I said; it's very general. The suburb where I live (Dromana) is as good as any place on earth that I've lived at (or visited). There is nowhere else I've seen yet that I would rather move to. Maybe California for the weather. It's just stuff to fill up the paper and a spot on the 6.00...

It could also mean that there is more reproduction going on by the lower socio-economic group than the group above it. This is the case in every place I've ever lived, from my observation. Basically, the poorer areas have more kids than the middle-class and above, and they have them...

Very general. Bayside in Melbourne (where I live) is absolutely enormous.