Search results

.toe that isnt the same math. mine says we have the same ratio of medium regionals to population then they do. yours assumes there should be a correlation between size of largest two (why two largest?) cities and total pop. not trying to hold up the analysis here. I do think we should be...

looking at the maths... 304 mil / 21 mil = 14.5 10 cities in that range * 14.5 = 145 - so in reality we have the same ratio of cities in that population to the US :) I dont think we should grow meaningless regionals, but i do think there will be a natural shift, due to supply and price...