Search results

  1. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    My real first preference would be for solar, wind, or wave generated energy. We get plenty of all 3 in Australia... but its just so far from being viable with the cost to develop and not really any pay off. Getting that across it to the masses is a hard task - that getting nuclear going, it...
  2. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    Fukishima is an awful example and not comparable to what we're talking about. All the countries I listed above are into it.
  3. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    Countries using Nuclear power (we should really be joining this list or be left behind): US, Canada,France, Japan,Russia,South Korea,Germany,Ukraine,China,United Kingdom,Sweden,Spain,Belgium,Taiwan,India,Czech Republic,Switzerland,Finland,Bulgaria,Hungary,Brazil,South...
  4. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    The waste products can be fed back through. Nuclear prevents more deaths than it causes (by way of reducing air pollution by fossil fuel methods).
  5. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    The nuclear waste in modern systems is recyclable
  6. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    Extemely poor example. All the ones in other countries are going great
  7. D.T.

    Should Australia Go Nuclear? (or at least move further down that path)

    Absolutely yes. It's safer, more effective and more cost efficient than all other forms of power were currently using
Back
Top