Search results

That sounds all very well for the lawyer cu.....but what about the deal between the two principal's of the deal....especially if they both wish to proceed ?? The amount of times the head duck's agree in principle, and then it gets shot down in flames over the "yeah but what if scenarios"...

Indeed there are always a myriad amount of ways to look at things.....but as an efficient decision maker, one must eventually get off the pot and choose which angle you will finally go with. Agreed, I have seen many of them make long term Tenants. Whether they are great long term Tenants is...

Yeah, well it's a little more complicated than just that Player. The head duck knows exactly what is strategically going on with the company. A successful enterprise won't mind paying over the odds for a top spot or nice infrastructure or good access to something they want, or just plenty...

Exactly. More common than one would think. When the head duck says "Yes we will take it".....normally they don't like being contradicted and undermined by some nit-picky little lawyer type.

Unless of course something like this is in Lease.....in which case what you have written is not correct ; Once again, it is impossible to intelligently comment unless first seeing the entire document to which the original poster refers.

Don't know Reeco, I simply palm that responsibility off to the Tenants. How they discharge that responsibility (via pay or claim on their insurances) is up to them. I'm too busy looking after my side of the contract to worry about what they need to do and how they manage their business.

Whatever it says in your Lease. No point asking anybody on here as they haven't read it. If you are looking for a "standard" or a "normal" answer, there is no such thing. It will boil down to you having to actually read what it says. You will be far wiser once having read it. (I'm...