Search results

  1. Dazz

    Your property has been listed for rent too cheaply when you have over 3000 views

    Hmmm....funny how things turn out. In the middle of last week before leaving for Sydney, I palmed it off again to the same PM who couldn't rent it at $ 700 pw back in March and April. Their remit from me was "frankly I couldn't give a rats about it anymore, just don't put in a whinge...
  2. Dazz

    Your property has been listed for rent too cheaply when you have over 3000 views

    Hmmm, I keep reading this as well. Tenants moaning again, lack of available housing, rents rising, Landlords in clover etc etc etc. It's even in today's paper again. We aren't finding that at all. We have dropped our rent by $ 120 per week and still we can't get a sniff.... Sometimes...
  3. Dazz

    Your property has been listed for rent too cheaply when you have over 3000 views

    Hi Invstor, As I said, there was only one cheeky offer made, and even then it was just a verbal throw away boast probably....certainly nothing on paper, that of 950K cash. The place is worth 1.35m, at least that is what the Bank is carrying as it's valuation. Remember, the place only...
  4. Dazz

    Your property has been listed for rent too cheaply when you have over 3000 views

    Ouch, that is a bit close to the bone.....hahahaha..... :D Short answer - yes. Useful answer - see below. Happy to disclose, I couldn't give a rats. The Tenants left in January. They were paying $ 820 per week for the past 2 years. We tried to re-let it out again at $ 820 pw...
  5. Dazz

    Your property has been listed for rent too cheaply when you have over 3000 views

    Someone has spent a LOT of time and effort and money renovating that. To then ask a piddly 18K pa is simply a true reflection of the madness of that particular "market". With large outgoing costs, along with the risk of damage and the very weighty and onerous obligations regarding health...
Back
Top