Search results

The property was last sold a few years ago. The original contract I received had two names as vendors and the latest one with the added clause only had one vendor. I suspect there's been some sort of partnership that has gone awry and one has bought the other out.

Would it be best to add a clause that the vendor is to provide the buyer a copy of the transfer within x days?

I've noticed that the initial contract I was given had two people listed as the vendor. The latest one is only in one name. Does this sound like a plausible reason to include the clause that they did?

My lawyer hasn't requested any clauses. The vendor, who is a lawyer, added it in himself.

Thanks for the translation. I didn't make it clear earlier, but the clause was actually put in by the vendor. I'm trying to buy this place.

I've just had a clause sprung on me in a contract. My lawyer is unavailable tonight, so I just wanted to get a heads up before talking to them tomorrow. Does anyone know what the following means? An executed prior stamped transfer in favour of the seller, and an executed unstamped transfer...