Search results

Look here and here and what's this???? and finally, defending the indefensible

Never. She was always upfront in stating, prior to the las election, that there would be a CT introduced if she was elected PM. :p

Whack jobs, not whackos. There is a difference. You just upset another marginalised group.

Agreed. She stated categorically what her position was before the election. Right after that, she changed her mind to suit her political means and arguably consign the Labor party and The Greens to oblivion come the next election. I think she badly misread public sentiment in the swing to...

The Greens and ex Nationals are fictional?????? :confused: But hang on, you are correct, I guess they will be come next election.

...add in the tree hugging whack jobs and the straw chewing turncoats and it's an abomination.

Better watch out. Your place might be confiscated as the proceeds of crime. :eek:

Actually was quite serious on the matter. The hollow men are probably jumping for joy that this has come along. They can jump on board this, change tack with the gullible public and make Juliar out to be a caring person and get her popularity up. Give it time and their might be some...

Waiting for the announcement from Juliar that she'll introduce a tax on night clubs and pubs or a levy on all our pay packets to address the prevalence of one punch deaths.

That there is the root of all this evil.

"Luckily" is the correct terminology. The majority of uneducated people working for wages think that their 9% super will look after them for al of their retirement. This is far from the truth. The government will still have to kick in pension money to support these people sold the lie...

So we all start paying carbon tax trying to stop polluting the planet (CO2 = pollution????) and the temperature will keep on rising. Happens all the time. All we're doing is speeding up this cycle. Has happened before and yet here we are. If "modern" man has been around for so long, I...

That's after they've been vetted by a select committee and Juliar's answers developed by another. :D Juliar, answering the tough questions.

To be fair that is per capita. But the raw numbers look like: 1983: $1000 per capita or about $15B debt 1986: $2000 per capita of about $32B debt 1990: $1000 per capita or about $17B debt 1996: $5800 per capita or about $105B debt 2007: $2800 per capita or about $58B surplus 2012...

Here we go.......... http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/til-debt-do-us-part-the-credit-bill-you-didnt-know-you-had/ Even if the 1983 Lab government had Lib debt to contend with, they did a bang up job getting it up and over that for the incoming 1996 Libs to to reduce. The Labor govt...

Don't think so. When asked the question the PM did not say it was a 5% reduction in levels she skirted the question, but when pressured said it was a 5% reduction in the growth. It was 6PR yesterday morning from 9.20am on with Paul Murray. She was being very squirmy in her responses.

I heard on the radio when the PM was IVed that it is not a 5% reduction in today's levels, but a 5% reduction in the annual growth in CO2 emissions today in 2020. What a load of carp!!!!! All this mistargeted taxing for nil effect and in fact more CO2 than we have today. It's a lie being fed...

I remember KRudd handing out $900 to those poor families to buy their plasmas, not sure about Johnnie Howard. I think you had to have a baby first and then blow in on booze and ciggies under Johnnie's programme. At least Johnnie's programme would get more back in the government coffers...