Search results

There has been more than one election in the history of Australia..

I'm ashamed to admit I voted liberal when I see the low gutter politics that he is using, and the lack of any vision, apart from constant negativity and attacks. So swings and roundabouts. I am also thoroughly fed up with the current lot for their poor policies and lack of any real vision.

Fair points, especially re Latham. Lose cannon is an insult to cannons. I, however, don't think Abbott has the right temperament. Hockey, Bishop, Turnball, yes. Abbott no. I am quite confident in the libs winning the next election. I have no ties to labor except that they are more in...

No. He gives any liberal member who is not a rampant right winger a hard time. There is a difference. It's like saying a member of the communist party press is fair and balanced because they give a Leninist a hard time whilst completely supporting the line a Stalinist takes.

And then you will jump up and down because one small sector of the media is not giving a free pass to your brand. Sales has given Gillard a hard time in the past. But it's only bias if you don't agree with it, I guess.

Fair enough. I don't trust any of the current lot in leadership. At least with Rudd he promised something. Both Abbott and Gillard are completely uninspiring. And the policies are also uninspiring. It's just the same short sighted I will do anything to get power in the short term and...

At least the goggomobile is interesting. And isn't the same boring American junk reheated. Which is what we have from the 2 major parties.

Does this mean that this poll is to be believed with reference to the national government as it shows that in Qld a number of people are very unhappy with the LNP performance? http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/newmans-poll-slump-as-cuts-polarise-voters-20120820-24ibt.html Or do...

Bwahahaha, you are identical to Evan. Just follow a different brand. It's like having the son of a Holden fan and the son of a Ford fan bellowing at each other across the playground.

No. Just that if it is within the boundaries of what can be printed then there should be no restrictions on what is printed. That doesn't mean it is right. And what do you defined as right? Factually right? Morally right?

People should feel free to print what they want within the bounds of the law. It just doesn't mean that it's accurate or worth replying to. For instance, take the rantings of David Icke about how the royal family are a bunch of repitilian aliens. He is free to rant about it. That doesn't...

No worries. And yes. Draw whatever conclusions you want and apply that to whoever you want.

No, sorry, wasn't clear. I was saying that the blog is set up as combative and one sided forum that twists and manipulates and potentially creates facts and that it is hard to argue with such a site because there is just an extremist, polemic driven viewpoint.

While I do understand your position and frustration, ranting, swearing blogs that rely on insults and cheap characterisations are not really worth the time of arguing with. It's like a rational conservative engaging in a debate with a hard line leninist student blogger. Just not worth the...

While I agree it is too early for the champagne corks to be popped, or the bottles of sleeping pills and vodka to be downed, depending on your perspective, I really don't think there is much doubt about the ALP loss. Unless every single liberal member across the country is suddenly arrested...