Search results

Reply: 2.1.1.1.1.2 From: Jas On 4/2/02 5:30:00 PM, Dale Gatherum-Goss wrote: >It is possible for the owner >to claim that the house was >always their PPOR and >therefore not subject to CGT. >This is so regardless of >whether the tenant was there >or not. Hang on... My accountant told me...

Reply: 2.1 From: Jas > From: "Glenn Mott" <[email protected]> > > Further to this question Dale, should Rae's tenant move out and Rae occupy > the property herself, how long would she have to stay before the whole > property would be considered her Principal Place of Residence? Hey...