Search results

I think the point is that lacc, for unspecified reasons, wants the tenants on a fixed-term rather than periodic agreement.

The new lease wouldn't be signed until at least 60 days and possibly up to 90 days, anyway. So they would have notice.

Right, so first 60 days they're on a periodic lease on the old rent. 90 days (max) their periodic lease ends. I think what thatbum is saying is "why bother with a rent increase under the old periodic lease for the sake of 30 days?" I'm also not sure if you can increase rent during a period...

Can I clarify that you're talking about the first 60 days post-settlement on the existing rent, and 30 days (days 61-90) on the increased rent, and then they have to leave? If so, what do you need new tenancy agreements for at all? Or have I misunderstood - what period does this "short fixed...