Search results

Oh, I see. Interesting. I'm sure you're not alone, but the fact that people's views vary so widely is precisely why I think making disclosure a legal requirement was erroneous. What if the murder happened on the site, but that house was demolished and a new one built? Does the "bad vibe"...

Here we agree, my friend. Termites and flooding are a tenant's business and may affect the livability of the property; a murder won't. ;) If a decision not to live in a house where there's been a murder isn't related to a concern about supernatural activity, then what is the basis for it...

Yes, I would (if I was otherwise interested in purchasing). I don't think that past activity has any impact. I'd happily live in a house where some had been murdered, where somebody had committed suicide, that had formerly been a vet surgery where animals were euthanased, that used to be a...

I'm with you (I think); I think this is a RIDICULOUS requirement. The law should deal in tangibles. If people hold a superstition about this, then they should ask about the history of the property, and they should be answered truthfully, but requiring a vendor to disclose is plain ridiculous. As...