Search results

Thank you, Dale. Dave, valuer yesterday said it would be land value only for that one! Zero value for house; though I know what you mean, it is a liability as it would cost money to demolish. :)

Not sure what you mean, Dale. Surely, Julia is right that you don't need a QS report? So, are you disputing that one can't make a reasonable assumption of value - and that should be done by a QS? Or is it something in an earlier post?

Yes, I think Julia meant pre-1985. My experience matches yours Geoff; even for pre '85 buildings the QS tax depreciation schedules produced great results. It really is virtually essential for every property. The only house I haven't had the QS through was built in ~1950. It is very basic...

Cam, I'm with you. I believe a QS report is not an absolutely necessity. A QS report from another unit I guess would not be strictly legally usable. The QS would be liable for the report for the unit for which it was prepared, but not for use of the report for other units. However, it...