Search results

That is interesting about the diabetes. Maybe she became faint and fell because of low blood sugar, and perhaps the maintenance had little to do with it.

Excellent advice! And make sure the date stamp is on the photo too!

Well, I think any concerns you may have had have gone out the door because this has moved far beyond the scope of the original claim!

Well, I am sure your Insurance company will be very pleased with that development. Your PM from "A" should put her claims of fraud in writing while still fresh in her mind and get this to your Insurance company as soon as possible. They will be the ones to press charges because really, the...

Its a giant leap of faith that you would have simply paid up

Have they actually given you a letter of claim yet? Like they do with traffic accidents - with full details, witness statements and 2 quotes for repairs? OK, have read it all through again. All you have to do is 'make good' if indeed you are found to be liable. You dont need to replace an...

Maybe it happened a while ago and has only just recovered from those. Or maybe he was down at the pub drinking with his mates and they cooked up this scheme? I am thinking too, unless the leg was brand new, dont you only have to 'make good' - ie bring it back to where it was just before the...

Surely tenants cant just sue because something happened? eg falling on ice in winter. Doesnt there have to be some kind of negligence involved, which means that the Landlord had to have been told that there was a problem likely to cause an injury, and the landlord ignored it and then an...

I think the point is that the Harley might be missing because it has been in a dingle, which might also result in injuries to one's leg. Maybe you can counter sue the tenant for damages to repair the paving caused by flooding the area?

Some of these jokes are so lame..

Sounds like one step forward two steps backwards to me

OK, back to serious. Where do you draw the line between people just falling over, and a landlord being responsible? Is there a definition similar to that used for furnishings - eg Fair wear and tear versus damage? Surely, if the house is well maintained, eg no holes on the carpet to trip on...

Yep, think it will run for a while yet!