Search results

Is this what happened to you?

The issue here is if you say do your first loan with ING and pay LMI. Then you start to grow your portfolio with via other lenders with more generous borrowing capacity. Meanwhile the property with ING has increased in value and you go back to do an equity release - the problem is that a)...

They fund over 55's developments whereas only 2 other small tier lender do these. I don't think holding these types of securities for when armageddon hits is a good risk mitigation strategy. Also limitation of 2 offsets and inability to apply a pragmatic approach to credit decisioning is...

What was the reason for going with ING in the first instances? Moving onto NAB is a huge jump in lender selection from ING.

1. Flimsy overall policy 2. Black and white credit policy - very similar to AMP 3. Terrible borrowing capacity 4. Only allow for 2 offsets per client/couple 5. Terrible cash out / equity release policy BUT they are great for funding an over 55's development and for vanilla...

armpit hair is the new black

ING could offer to plonk me on a deserted island with irina shayk and I still wouldn't use them.