Search results

Reply: 2.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel I prefer the term "consensus" ;-) And anyway... it's always been like this... Ian set the initial guidelines, and we've kind of kept ourselves in line since then (well... at least that's what I've seen for the 16 months or so I've been around anyway)...

Reply: 2.2.1.1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel Well said Alan. I propopse a new guideline that newsletter announcements should be posted in "Meeting Point" in future. Any objections ? "Long live the spam-free Property Investment Forum" Thanks once again Ian & Jan for making these forums available...

Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1 From: Sim' Hampel That is exactly what I suggested... if it's such a problem, let's make the guideline that newsletter adverts go into Meeting Point along with the seminars and courses ("free", "at cost" and "for fee") which appear in there. Problem solvered. Property...

Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel On 2/15/02 4:20:00 PM, Jacinta Thomler wrote: > >That thin edge of the wedge is now >looking suspiciously thicker ;) Not sure I follow, Jas ?

Reply: 1.2.1.1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel Okay, we can come up with definitions for spam which will make even my posts look evil ;-) I guess it comes down to what we get out of it... personally, given that any advertising Michael does within his newsletter is subtle and not in-your-face like...

Reply: 1.2.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel On 2/15/02 1:14:57 PM, Jacinta Thomler wrote: > >My concern is bulk >unsolicited email. Unsolicited email ? Where did email come into it ? >If Frank Snead is told to >share his info and not just >give out his phone >number, doesn't this look a >little...

Reply: 1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel I draw a distinction here because MY is posting info on a newletter full of useful and interesting property investing information and is NOT full of sales adverts. I feel there is little difference between MY posting this and one of us posting a link to a news...