Search results

Reply: 1.1.1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel Good point Rob - had forgotten about those users. However they would come under the "lurker" category as they are definitely not active in posting. But you are right, the numbers of forum readers would probably be higher than those figures indicate.

Reply: 1.1.1 From: Sim' Hampel On 4/19/02 1:13:00 AM, Mike . wrote: >Hi Sim, > >I was wondering how you got >that stat. After looking >around I eventually clicked >Search Users. Then I clicked >Search without a search >phrase. > >The following statement >appeared: > >Found 3,104 user(s)...

From: Sim' Hampel Wow... I turn my back for a second and another 500 or so users join the forum ! Last time I checked (about a month or so back), there was only 2500, now there is 3100. Of course there are some duplicate names there, but it does show that the forum is growing quite rapidly !