Search results

well for once it's missing a key broken promise of being a government that will not break promises. secondly i don't see a broken promise of surpluses every year. so that makes it even. the ones they have completed mostly relate to either unwinding labor policies, or investigating labor govt...

i reckon we should let them have a go. cuz you know, that's what Tony wants, he said everyone should have a go :D

are you for real? they are doing the opposite of what they promised. how's that progress? the end of mining boom has been talked about for as long as i can remember. even on this forum. it's a pretty poor excuse to use for covering the incompetence. if you wanna compare first 18months of...

some lie more than others in this particular case Tony even lied about his government being the government that will not backflip on promises. how pathetic. circumstances always change. no govt could be better than a govt that cannot even plan for a year.

they are still spending it. that's what deficit means. the only difference is that they are telling you upfront that they will be borrowing money, rather then half a year later when they discover that things didn't turn out as they hoped, and the purse is empty.

i was expecting you to start protecting the government. and you delivered :) totally support govt getting honest. but i think it should happen before the elections, not after. if the government promises one thing before the election and then finds excuses to break virtually every promise...

just as i expected :rolleyes:

like a new car

i'm not sure how $35.1b is less than $29.8b. must be some sort of lib math

so the net result is more debt and a record deficit. i wonder how lib supporters will spin that :rolleyes: