Search results

  1. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    This I agree with. The question, I guess, is whether margin-calling a residential property loan would be in the shareholders interest. It's an intriguing question.
  2. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    I think you're probably right. I guess I'm just keen to find out what it really means for me.
  3. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    The issue, then, seems to be whether general market falls constitute an actual fall of a specific property, being used as security for a loan. For me, the real question is simply "can the bank ask for additional security in the event my LVR drops below a certain level"? As investors, the...
  4. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    Has anyone got any actual examples of this occurring with residential property loans?
  5. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    But isn't that exactly the point? If you margin call someone on a property there's a high probability you'll have to repossess and sell the asset, which destroys the ongoing cashflow of the loan, as well as potentially devaluing other similar assets held as collateral. The flipside is of...
  6. V

    NCCP Act 2009: Lenders not permitted to 'call in' loans unless borrower is in default

    The question we have to ask is WHY a bank would take such action against a borrower? If a borrower is making regular repayments, and has the means to continue to do so, what possible reason could the bank have for potentially destroying a paying customer's financial situation? Why on earth...
Back
Top