Search results

The money in this instance is trivial Peter, it is my time and energy....which you attach less value to than I....which is unnecessary, don't you think? If I had always thought you were of Henry Kaye calibre, I wouldn't have attended your seminar. However, I have in the past thought you were a...

Novice investors don't know a lot, especially how to interpret a PDS, and identify the risks taken to chase the reward.....but Peter isn't targeting novice investors, is he?

Listen Peter, you can adopt whatever persona you want in your presentations, reveal as much or as little as you like, spin it this way and that, and take as much of your audience's time. I don't care now...as I won't be back. I understand your method, as I've seen it three times, and I say...

hehehe.....reminds me of when I was a young lad, and every May holidays, we had to wash the house and clean the gutters on the family home. and younger bro thought it was funny to remove the ladder when I was on the roof....until I eventually got down and chained him to the Hills hoist for an...

Option income is one thing crc, but can a fund manager ignore portfolio value? Is an investor better off making 15% in options income if portfolio value goes down 30%? I don't buy that a fund manager can be so good at derivative arbitrage, that they can offset the risk associated with a strong...

I agree there are serious strategy and risk differences between MOO and STW. However, MOO uses the S&P50 Accumulation Index as a benchmark. And sorry. I erroneously used 29/10/09 as the inception date. which raises a sobering point. During the MOO presentation I attended in Brisbane, I was...

I presume what you refer to as yield is the distribution figure mentioned in crc's Feb snapshot. That's 5.552 cents per unit. But note "fund performance" for the 3 mths is -2.38% and the price of a unit is 95.7cents, presumably down from $1. As I raised above, be careful how you interpret...

That's how a rational person would understand it. But not the way it is reported in the MOO fund update....growth and option income are thrown in a soup, then compared against an accumulation index, which has a different style and risk profile.

PB, how about another explanation? I am a bit fuzzy on how funds report performance. I get mixed up on what part of fund performance is share performance, what's options income, and what's my own capital being returned to me. Can you explain MOO performance as per the pdf crc linked to.