Search results

  1. Witzl

    Dept of housing putting "buyer must be owner occupier" in contracts of sale

    sounds like it will be easier to just avoid these properties with the DOH clause, and target the ones without. Cheers for the help guys... we'll keep investigating for our own personal interests, but I'd say my mate will just target the houses without the clause.
  2. Witzl

    Dept of housing putting "buyer must be owner occupier" in contracts of sale

    if it's a caveat... then it's gay and i will be recommending my friend avoid it like the plaigue. EDIT: waiting for a copy of a contract to see just how it's put in there.
  3. Witzl

    Dept of housing putting "buyer must be owner occupier" in contracts of sale

    Its funny cos my friend and I havent noticed this before, but now it is placed on pretty much every dept of housing property listed for sale. He even bought 2 dept of housing properties this year without this clause (one last month). Is it really a binding clause? I mean - once you buy a...
  4. Witzl

    Dept of housing putting "buyer must be owner occupier" in contracts of sale

    This is in part a legal question, but it also factors into the property market economics side as well - so i thought it prudent to post it here: --------------- A bit of a curly one has come up from my friend, who is currently trying to buy his 3rd property..... His strategy is to buy cheap...
Back
Top