Search results

Then you either create a two-tiered system, or you shut some people out of it altogether. Where do you draw the line? It's not about whether your requirements are straightforward, it's about whether there are ways to maximise benefits to your heirs. Remembering that estate assets might...

Nothing is wrong with it. However, I'm willing to pay for quality advice on things like wills. Most people want quality advice but aren't willing to pay for it, probably because they don't understand the nature of legal advice (i.e. you're paying for the person's training and experience, not the...

I think if you increased requirements for solicitors so that all solicitors were fully up to speed with super and high level tax planning, you would 1) have far fewer solicitors, and 2) the remaining ones would charge a lot more.

At least garbage will stink enough to remind you that you've forgotten about it. Sounds like it's worth including a binding beneficiary form with a person's tax return and just get them to sign one every year.

Yes but how hard is it to put a reminder every 3 years to sign a form? Noting that if life insurance is purchased in super, it'll mean a significant balance if you were to die young.

Isn't that why they have binding beneficiary nomination every 3 years to make sure it goes your estate?