Search results

Uumh, we are paying $75 through our RE.

I think it's more to do with avoiding litigation than anything else. I could be wrong (I'm sure someone will tell me if I am ;)) but I think in that terrible Childers backpacker's hotel fire the landlord was eventually held responsible (at least partly) for the fire because the smoke alarms...

I think all RE's are sending out this sort of message. I guess they don't want to be held responsible if something goes wrong and by paying a third party to check the smoke alarms it sort of shifts the responsibility away from the landlord and the PM. The legislation here in Queensland...