Search results

  1. C

    Negative Gearing on chopping block

    Correct but the average voter is not that smart and the mention of something changing to share investment could spook them. I believe that less than 8% of the population are investors so any changes to investment property would be more attractive.
  2. C

    Negative Gearing on chopping block

    I agree wholeheartedly. Unfortunately the majority of voters hold shares through their superannuation funds so any govt would be reluctant to do so.
  3. C

    Negative Gearing on chopping block

    Has any organisation looked at taxing property owners for dwellings that are not inhabited (say for 2+ years). There would be significant properties where the owner for one reason or another (i.e in a nursing home, overseas, does not want the fuss of tenants, waiting for a development etc)...
Back
Top