Search results

Natasha, you dont need to get married. These days women earn as much or more than men. they can get laid and have a baby. Then you get government support, and 30% of the mans wage for the next 18 years. If you shack up with the guy for 6 months, you get 75% of his house as well.. So why would...

it might make more sense for the woman for the man to work because he earns more, but the man might think its more important for him to spend time with the child, rather than earning more money for the family. again, perfect example how women only think of the $$$, over the child's welfare...

no one said having babies is not hard work, what I said is having babies is a lifestyle choice. its a choice where many women expect the man to work, and pay for their choice. and in the case of the OP, the women is getting upset cause the man might be 'tight' with his money. so obviously she is...

kathryn, your situation is very fair!! well done! obviously you were not interested in gold digging, and I like how you view child care as a privilege, not a burden. Good on ya for splitting the assets down the line.. this is how it should be, not that the man is wiped out financially..

From what I see women expect the man to work full time - miss out on the childs growth - and then come home and help with 'house work'. When the relationship doesnt work out women get 75% of a mans assets, which include the house, super, cash, cars, business, etc and a further 75% of his...

buying a sports car is also not a free ride. you have to pay for it, but in the end you get a reward. Women choose a lifestyle, ie having babies, and then expect a man to come in and pay for it. if I choose a lifestyle and buy a $100k sports car, then I pay for it and maintain it. I don't...

seems like she is looking for money.. wants to play babies at home, while he works. Now since she doesn't have his credit card, and is going and breaking his trust by talking to people about it.. Marriage isn't a free ride for women..