Search results

I don't think so. Kevin has no troops. As soon as the numbers turned down for him, he was friendless, and he is still friendless. If Labor was to go back to Kev, they would be admitting they made a huge mistake when they kicked him out. I can't remember once hearing a politician admit to a...

Saw about 5 minutes of it, and that was enough. I thought it was pretty rough. I can imagine the outcry if the ABC had greenlit 'At home with John and Jeanette'.

Beattie? Or Garrett???:D

From the court evidence reported in the press, the assault charges haven't been dropped. It's interesting tough, that it wasn't recorded in the court docs.

This is interesting. Wonder who it was doing the 'heavying'. Everything I've read and heard says she has been charged with shoplifting. and assault.

They come in all shapes and sizes. They like shock jocks, the share market, and are anti-PC, to name but a few.

You're over-reaching. Even Bolt, the most strident of her critics, says she didn't know Wilson was embezzling funds. Bolt makes crystal clear, more than once, that there was no mention of Gillard doing anything improper in the stat dec. There is plenty of ammunition for critics of the...

So your one example shows that all staff at the ABC are drug takers and / or criminals? I realise you operate on stereotypes and no basis of fact (inner city poets, anyone?), but even for you, this is rubbish. Now, where's that ignore button....

Except The Australian has lost money since its inception. He swings, but in my opinion he swings more often and with greater vigour to the right. A quick look at his opinion columnists would suggest, to me, his papers are harder on the left than the right.

Good question. The thing with Murdoch is that he swings with the breeze. He could tell the public were more than likely to vote in a Labor government, so he backed Labor, too. It makes his organisation look more powerful, rather than going against the prevailing tide. Now that the public has...

You're missing the point. The article stated that she lived with this guy, and she didn't. The Australian has apologised and said they got the story wrong. Why do you feel the need to muckrake over this? If there was something in it, I'm sure The Australian wouldn't have apologised or...

Were they living together? That's the contentious bit, even Bolty says they weren't. And why would the courts not allow a newspaper to mention that she was living with this guy? It sounds more logical to me that Milne got his facts wrong. Happy to be corrected though, if you have some more info.

Hi Jo, I don't think it's an attack on free speech. Freedom of speech doesn't mean the writer or speaker is free of responsibility if they get it wrong. It looks like Milne got the story wrong, and the Oz were forced to apologise. Even Bolt said that he didn't think she shared a house...