Search results

No issues purchasing through a trust. Tax implications are a conversation you should have with your accountant, because different trust structures attract different tax treatment.

QAHC owns the NRAS allocation, because they are the Approved Participant. They allow you to access the scheme through their status as an Approved Participant (this is why you sign the QAHC agreement) and then they pass the incentive through to you in return for a small NRAS fee/compliance fee...

The CF effectiveness of NRAS, if that's what you mean - is affected by several things other than the price. Weekly rent and establishment costs ( stamp duty, deposit etc) can have an impact as well. It's true that broadly speaking, less expensive properties generate a higher return on equity...

Gee you love a good long - bowed generalisation! "all overpriced" .... I guess it must be horribly inconvenient for you that I've found 120 + NRAS properties for clients in the past 18 months or so, where all valuations (barring one with a 9K shortfall) came in on contract price? Or that...

1. They require a 25.1 % rental discount vs 20% elsewhere 2. They charge 10% + GST of market rent for tenancy management vs 8 or 9% +GST % of the discounted NRAS rent charged by most other models. This is why they are my least preferred NRAS model. They affect your cash flow by @...

That particular consortium are - how shall I say this politely - ummm.... the last I'd deal with. I'll do some homework and report back, but I am not aware of any change to the NRAS Scheme Act 2008. I have not received any such communication from any of the consortiums responsible...

Not sure I quite understand the numbers you have posted TMNT If someone is earning 25K, they are only paying tax on only $6,800 of income, as the first 18,200 is tax free.... and the Marginal Tax Rate is 19% not 17% . And if there are already significant deductions from other IP's...

http://www.switzerbroker.com.au/broker-video/edwards06082104/ Positive thoughts on Orange, NSW

My concern with that is how they actually generate the cash flow, without NRAS. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors and trickery with the strategies promoted by those sorts of groups. Used to be promoted using Lines Of Credit - now its promoted using Offsets. But unless they can show you...

Redom is correct ... Quick example. Broad brushstrokes, using a 350K strata titled property as an example. Loan 1 - secured against whichever property provides equity - 60K 10% deposit = 35K. Stamp Duty = 13K. legals 2K. 10K Cash Buffer. Loan 2 - secured against the NRAS INV...

Unless you are one of the very few investors in Australia who is able to buy pre tax CF + properties , you use negative gearing anyway, Devank. It's not like it's exclusive to NRAS, so that's a non argument. That same "problem" of needing to work to get negative gearing benefits...if it is in...

CJAY is correct - the concept works very well when employed correctly and offers many benefits, but it's also plagued by scoundrels. It is critical to invest in NRAS approved properties at fair value so that you aren't losing a big portion of the benefits to overpricing, before you even get...