Search results

  1. E

    SMSF 100k startup too risky?

    This is all true, yes- but you aren't accounting for the role the planner will play in influencing most SMSF's investment strategies. It is the planner who will be pushing the diversification barrow. It is the planner who will likely be pushing the anti property barrow. It is the planner who...
  2. E

    SMSF 100k startup too risky?

    Any planner signing off on a Statement Of Advice and Investment Strategy involving residential property investment for a newly established SMSF with less than 100K in available funds, would have a VERY tough time satisfying ASIC they are offering adequate and responsible advice. A fund with...
  3. E

    SMSF 100k startup too risky?

    Conventional wisdom is that a balance of 200K is about the right amount to establish an SMSF... with 150K being considered the bare minimum required. With 100K of combined Super, you'd be putting all your eggs in one basket by purchasing a property, with no room left to do anything else...
Back
Top