Search results

Well, not really a query, i jut wanted you to decide whether we are paying $6 billion interest per year by borrowing money OS for stimulus as you said in one post or whether the money came from Howard's so-called surplus as you said in another. :rolleyes: You have ignored it (for good reason)...

Maybe you guys get a different view of the NSW govt than what we do. Over here Ofarrell is getting to be really on the nose. As the previous party, he's doing SFA and trying to make it look much better than it is. Meanwhile, im still waiting for replies to my queries to Dazz and Turk's...

How can they be borrowing from overseas and paying that much interest when you've said repeatedly they got the money from Howard's surplus? And regarding the surplus, if Howard's govt didn't run down public services and infrastructure and squirrel away money like the good little Menzies...

All I can hear is crickets chirping.

What it shows is the years of deficit coincide with years of recession. That coincide with labor being in power. And it shows the years of surplus coincide with Howard being in power coincide with the benefits of world wide linear growth. Again, which imploded as the GFC. As that growth was all...

My thoughts exactly. Labor was in power for 2 massive economic downturns. The early 90s and the 08 GFC. And a couple of minor ones. Liberal was mostly in power for periods of uninterrupted global growth. The big one was 90s/early 2000s which was built on debt and imploded as the GFC in 08...

Not making CG during the GFC doesnt make sense. It would make sense if the asset was bought and sold in the GFC period. But I'm sure plenty we're sold during the GFC and bought well before it. Therefore I think CG revenue change during the GFC to the govt Would be minimal. Not a bad try tho.

He's not implying, that's what the chart says. And did you mean liberal instead of Howard?

This is Abbotts black hole gillard and swan talk about. He keeps making promises that cost a bomb and says well also get the budget in the black. Hello! Either he'll renege on his promises or hell be in the red, can't be both.

Maybe you need to get a life mate. Seriously.

And -as always - they wil Blame the outgoing govt forthe mess they had to cleanup for their lack of success/lackof action/lies/or going back on promises. But we didn't knw about this.....and that...and this......:rolleyes: Just as the joke fatty obarrell govt has done in NSW.

Let's see their form If a major economic downturn occurs instead of the debt fueled world wide growth as happened during the Howard era. No one knew how bad it was till the GFC and by then labor was in power.

Ok, the first question I didn't answer because I couldn't understand it. The answer to the 2nd is I support labor not the leader, i will support the party regardless of who the leader is. I support left wing/centrist politics. Not the economic rationalism/hypocrite Christian/ redneck...

Keeping posts simple has nothing to do with not posting about the topic of the thread and instead posting dumb personal replies. The connection is about as tenuous as ausprops reasons For why the economy is shot. Just his opinions, nothing more. And with moral support by Dazz adding to the...

Could you add some substance to the discussion instead of 2 childish personal posts? Thanks mate.

Why do you feel the need to get personal? Youve been through your high faulting language stage and then the melodramatic drama queen period, not to mention angry man phase. Is this your next one? Getting personal. As for ausprops list. It's just the cycles of the economy. Does he expect...

I don't think so. Can you give me an eg. Cause I don't agree. We are the only nation that sailed through the GFC totally unscathed.

If our econmyis so bad, why do we have 5% interest rates?