Search results

Some intersrting posts Ricardo but an act of god is A natural event, not preventable by any human agency, such as flood, storms, or lightning. Forces of nature that noone has control over, and therefore no one cannot be held accountable. So on that account alone he would not be accounatable...

Hi Geoff. No its not relevent . Whats relevent is where the responsibility lies. if responsibity lies with my neighbor, the there is no insurance claim by me. If reposibiyt lies with me then my insurance company, if I had one, would be relevent I assumed that lots of people have had...

So you had to pay for the damage. Is thay your point? Why is warning them once insufficient. Whyis warning them more than twice not necessary. That seem odd BTW I have neither house not car insurance....my choice

It amazing how a thread can be side tracked. If I had wanted advise about what should have been done/should be done /could be done then I wouldnt have written in my first posting I am only interested in the legal answer in Australia at the the moment. I cant see the benefits of adding irrelevnt...

I have no insurer

What insurer????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

We had a severe storm last night and flying debris, from our neighbour, damaged our car. Our shared fence was damaged as well .Is he responsible for the damage? The details. Part 1 His trampoline was tied down and secured at a number of points, which he had done previously in a number of...