Search results

  1. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    Dear o dear... Seagulls have great vision, being up so high 'n that.
  2. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    Of course you can, I just thought you were arguing a case for lower migration levels on one hand, while saying we need the people on the other. On the actual levels, I agree we need to be at a sustainable level, whatever that is. I don't think 300,000 was intended to be the level for the...
  3. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    First you make up a story about the govts reasons for wishing to increase population, then make an arguement against it and call it ludicrous. I think you just defined ludicrous :)
  4. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    But what makes you think that it's not at a sensible level now? Your post seems to be a contradiction, first you are concerned that we are taking skilled doctors away from India and China, and then mention how much Australia needs them. With populations of 1 billion each, there are plenty...
  5. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    Countries need to be responsible for their own population problems, but Australia doesn't just accept migrants because their countries are over populated. We accept skilled migrants to fill a role and contribute to society in a mutually beneficial way, and we accept genuine refugees, which...
  6. G

    No More "Big Australia" (?)

    "Collective unconscious" is a great term for the types of people that would buy into that.
Back
Top