Search results

If this is the case then perhaps also a minimum amount of it needs to be kept in a cash management option within the fund or heavier regulation on those managing the super funds. I see increases in compulsory super a much more appealing choice than importing workers to pay for our elderly.

This is a pretty poor reason to increase our population IMO, I mean it's not really sustainable is it...if we have to double our population by 2050 to pay the pension for the current population, will we have to double it again by 2100 to support pensions for the intake between now and then...

Julia Gillard's first act - dumping 'Big Australia' I have heard comments on this site several times about strong population growth, where Australia's population was expected to rise to 36/42 million by 2050. It has been my opinion that such growth would simply not be sustainable (not only...