Search results

Definitely from a physical/emotional perspective, but the girl/woman is also the only one with the ability to terminate the pregnancy. Both parties have the option to use preventative measures, but the man is the one (potentially) left paying child maintenance for 18 years against his will...

Even so I think the context provided in this thread would throw the defacto status into question. Hardly assessed by Centrelink as a couple: Use of the word partner in the previous post was probably just the easiest way of putting it without the whole story which has now come out.

http://guidesacts.fahcsia.gov.au/guides_acts/ssg/ssguide-2/ssguide-2.2/ssguide-2.2.5/ssguide-2.2.5.10.html

http://www.tuq.org.au/pdfs/res_brochure.pdf Doubt there is any legal obligation here given the clarification it's in his name. Good luck to him, sounds like a crappy situation.

Is she on the lease? It reads as if he took her in as a friend rather than in an official capacity? He might not have any obligations in regards to her belongings.