Search results

That funny its always seem to go better when I made extra payments on my property, I think it was about reducing interest paid. And isnt it remarkable how the earning go up when you add more. Should we use the same leverage as in the 500K worth of property at 80% and at a higher interest rate...

Oracle If you are going to be so pedantic and just keep drumming your point. I have a challenge for you. Pedantic: Concerned with a unimportant point “Which one would have turned out to be a set and minimum management? Which one would have performed better with managed leverage risk...

Your statement was this "Which one would have turned out to be a set and minimum management? Which one would have performed better with managed leverage risk? Consider, the scenario where you keep re-financing at 80% every time your house price increased? I can't do that with shares without...

“I am not disputing how good shares investment can be” that’s not my point you stated “Which one would have turned out to be a set and minimum management” and the statement is wrong it’s nothing to do with which performs better property or shares, it was the statement you made, you assumed...

And I'll state it again, An enterprise against a stagant piece of property that actually devalves over time you are b******ting yourself or really believe it. I think the later.

[QUOTE=oracle;691919 Which one would have turned out to be a set and minimum management? Which one would have performed better with managed leverage risk? Consider, the scenario where you keep re-financing at 80% every time your house price increased? I can't do that with shares without...