Search results

What I am saying is: All things being equal, if an employer is able to pay $100k for a woman, but a man would insist on $150k...who would you hire? Now, if the employer still hires the man, there may be there factors at play, such as skater was referring to. Edit: Similar to buying...

IF women did get paid less for doing the same job, doesn't that put them at an advantage? I'm a firm believer, the market should always dictate wages and prices.