Search results

  1. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    Agreed. However I find it amazing how many people didn't have a problem with this, should it go ahead.
  2. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    Labor will not win this time around. Not to say that tony abbott won't do some tinkering. It seems gillard is doing everything she can to p*ss people off, and letting the next government clean up the mess.
  3. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    Now that is a bunch of rubbish. People get paid what is written on the wage scale, not what an employer wants to pay them. If that statement was actually true, supply and demand would be all that is required...and no government intervention.
  4. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    This sounds similar to what we heard from the Great Depression era, doesn't it. For what it is worth..I don't think you are alone.
  5. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    That's really the point. First, they want you to feel comfortable that it will never affect you. Could you imagine paying 40k for a car in 1970...but now it is common. Not only this, they go after the people who have worked and saved, taken risks all their lives to provide for their...
  6. kathryn d

    Govt sets $100,000 a year super threshold

    When I heard this on TV about the super, all I could think about was Tony Abbott gleefully rubbing his hands together. Tony is probably thinking, he doesn't even need to campaign, Gillard is just handing it to him on a platter. I don't have a super, but my husband does...so it will affect...
Back
Top